GENG 2-1
completed
... 125 more matches
Thursday, July 8th
7:45 PM EDT
Patch 3.0
SEN ban Breeze; GEN ban Ascent; SEN pick Bind; GEN pick Icebox; SEN pick Haven
Betting
Anonymous Betting & Instant Crypto Withdrawals
Ended
Use code VLR for $25 in free bets with first deposit.
Ended
VODs
Maps/Stats
All Kills
First Kills
Op Kills
koosta
GEN
|
Shawn12590
GEN
|
gMd
GEN
|
NaturE
GEN
|
MkaeL
GEN
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
8
6
+2
|
12
10
+2
|
6
7
-1
|
7
9
-2
|
8
6
+2
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
14
7
+7
|
11
10
+1
|
11
8
+3
|
13
7
+6
|
7
7
+0
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
10
7
+3
|
9
12
-3
|
10
8
+2
|
7
11
-4
|
10
7
+3
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
10
11
-1
|
15
13
+2
|
10
9
+1
|
12
13
-1
|
13
3
+10
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
7
9
-2
|
7
9
-2
|
12
7
+5
|
5
8
-3
|
10
6
+4
|
|
koosta
GEN
|
Shawn12590
GEN
|
gMd
GEN
|
NaturE
GEN
|
MkaeL
GEN
|
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
2
1
+1
|
2
1
+1
|
|
2
2
+0
|
1
1
+0
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
2
1
+1
|
2
0
+2
|
3
1
+2
|
|
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
2
2
+0
|
1
2
-1
|
3
3
+0
|
3
0
+3
|
1
1
+0
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
1
1
+0
|
5
7
-2
|
3
0
+3
|
1
0
+1
|
3
0
+3
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
1
1
+0
|
0
2
-2
|
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
koosta
GEN
|
Shawn12590
GEN
|
gMd
GEN
|
NaturE
GEN
|
MkaeL
GEN
|
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
1
2
-1
|
|
2
0
+2
|
|
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
|
| 2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
12
|
3
|
2
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
1
|
2
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
8
|
4
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
7
|
2
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
6
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
49
|
2
|
1
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
9
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
8
|
0
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
14
|
2
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
2
|
1
|
|
MkaeL
GEN
|
|
5
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
37
|
5
|
1
|
|
gMd
GEN
|
|
11
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
41
|
3
|
0
|
|
Shawn12590
GEN
|
|
12
|
1
|
1
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
2
|
1
|
|
NaturE
GEN
|
|
11
|
3
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
6
|
0
|
|
koosta
GEN
|
|
6
|
1
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
7
|
2
|
|
koosta
GEN
|
Shawn12590
GEN
|
gMd
GEN
|
NaturE
GEN
|
MkaeL
GEN
|
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
4
1
+3
|
4
5
-1
|
3
3
+0
|
2
5
-3
|
4
3
+1
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
3
2
+1
|
3
2
+1
|
1
4
-3
|
2
3
-1
|
1
6
-5
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
4
4
+0
|
4
3
+1
|
6
3
+3
|
1
4
-3
|
3
4
-1
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
4
5
-1
|
4
4
+0
|
5
4
+1
|
3
6
-3
|
4
0
+4
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
4
2
+2
|
3
6
-3
|
2
3
-1
|
3
3
+0
|
4
3
+1
|
|
koosta
GEN
|
Shawn12590
GEN
|
gMd
GEN
|
NaturE
GEN
|
MkaeL
GEN
|
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
1
1
+0
|
1
0
+1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
1
1
+0
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
0
1
-1
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
3
2
+1
|
|
1
1
+0
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
0
1
-1
|
0
2
-2
|
1
0
+1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
0
2
-2
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
koosta
GEN
|
Shawn12590
GEN
|
gMd
GEN
|
NaturE
GEN
|
MkaeL
GEN
|
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
6
Round 1
MkaeL koosta
Round 5
gMd Shawn12590
Round 14
Shawn12590 MkaeL
Round 15
NaturE koosta
Round 19
koosta Shawn12590
Round 23
koosta NaturE |
|
1
Round 8
MkaeL Shawn12590 NaturE gMd |
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
0
|
0
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
4
Round 6
MkaeL gMd
Round 11
MkaeL NaturE
Round 13
koosta Shawn12590
Round 17
koosta Shawn12590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
2
|
0
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
4
Round 2
MkaeL koosta
Round 4
NaturE MkaeL
Round 7
koosta NaturE
Round 15
Shawn12590 MkaeL |
1
Round 16
Shawn12590 gMd koosta |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
0
|
0
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
4
Round 2
gMd NaturE
Round 4
Shawn12590 koosta
Round 10
koosta NaturE
Round 23
Shawn12590 MkaeL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
2
|
0
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
2
Round 1
NaturE Shawn12590
Round 3
gMd NaturE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
2
|
1
|
|
MkaeL
GEN
|
|
4
Round 10
zombs dapr
Round 13
ShahZaM SicK
Round 14
zombs ShahZaM
Round 24
SicK dapr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
0
|
0
|
|
gMd
GEN
|
|
5
Round 9
TenZ SicK
Round 10
TenZ ShahZaM
Round 12
ShahZaM zombs
Round 16
SicK dapr
Round 18
TenZ dapr |
|
|
|
|
1
Round 10
ShahZaM TenZ |
|
|
|
57
|
1
|
0
|
|
Shawn12590
GEN
|
|
6
Round 1
zombs ShahZaM
Round 8
SicK zombs
Round 9
zombs ShahZaM
Round 11
dapr ShahZaM
Round 21
TenZ SicK
Round 22
dapr zombs |
|
|
|
1
Round 11
ShahZaM |
|
|
|
|
49
|
0
|
1
|
|
NaturE
GEN
|
|
5
Round 6
ShahZaM TenZ
Round 14
dapr TenZ
Round 15
zombs SicK
Round 16
zombs ShahZaM
Round 20
TenZ dapr |
2
Round 18
ShahZaM zombs SicK
Round 22
ShahZaM SicK TenZ |
|
|
1
Round 16
ShahZaM |
|
|
|
|
66
|
3
|
0
|
|
koosta
GEN
|
|
1
Round 12
TenZ SicK |
1
Round 17
ShahZaM zombs dapr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
6
|
0
|
|
koosta
GEN
|
Shawn12590
GEN
|
gMd
GEN
|
NaturE
GEN
|
MkaeL
GEN
|
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
3
2
+1
|
3
1
+2
|
3
2
+1
|
1
4
-3
|
2
2
+0
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
4
3
+1
|
6
3
+3
|
5
2
+3
|
8
0
+8
|
2
1
+1
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
3
2
+1
|
3
3
+0
|
1
1
+0
|
2
5
-3
|
2
3
-1
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
4
2
+2
|
6
2
+4
|
3
2
+1
|
6
4
+2
|
5
3
+2
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
2
3
-1
|
2
2
+0
|
5
2
+3
|
1
3
-2
|
5
3
+2
|
|
koosta
GEN
|
Shawn12590
GEN
|
gMd
GEN
|
NaturE
GEN
|
MkaeL
GEN
|
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
1
1
+0
|
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
2
0
+2
|
2
0
+2
|
|
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
1
1
+0
|
1
0
+1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
4
1
+3
|
1
0
+1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
koosta
GEN
|
Shawn12590
GEN
|
gMd
GEN
|
NaturE
GEN
|
MkaeL
GEN
|
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
|
2
0
+2
|
|
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
4
Round 5
gMd koosta
Round 9
 NaturE gMd
Round 14
NaturE MkaeL
Round 17
Shawn12590 NaturE |
3
Round 4
Shawn12590 koosta MkaeL
Round 8
Shawn12590 MkaeL NaturE
Round 10
Shawn12590 NaturE gMd |
|
|
1
Round 4
MkaeL |
|
|
|
|
79
|
0
|
2
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
1
Round 13
NaturE gMd |
1
Round 1
Shawn12590 MkaeL koosta |
|
|
2
Round 1
koosta
Round 13
gMd |
|
|
|
|
29
|
3
|
0
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
2
Round 7
koosta MkaeL
Round 16
gMd MkaeL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
2
|
1
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
3
Round 5
MkaeL NaturE
Round 14
gMd koosta
Round 17
MkaeL gMd |
1
Round 13
MkaeL koosta Shawn12590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
2
|
0
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
7
Round 1
gMd NaturE
Round 6
gMd NaturE
Round 7
NaturE gMd
Round 10
koosta MkaeL
Round 11
Shawn12590 NaturE dapr
Round 12
NaturE koosta
Round 20
NaturE koosta |
1
Round 2
NaturE gMd Shawn12590 |
1
Round 15
MkaeL gMd koosta Shawn12590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
0
|
0
|
|
MkaeL
GEN
|
|
1
Round 8
SicK dapr |
1
Round 2
zombs ShahZaM TenZ |
|
|
|
1
Round 2
ShahZaM TenZ |
|
|
|
55
|
2
|
1
|
|
gMd
GEN
|
|
2
Round 13
TenZ zombs
Round 19
TenZ dapr |
1
Round 3
dapr ShahZaM zombs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
0
|
0
|
|
Shawn12590
GEN
|
|
1
Round 4
SicK dapr |
|
1
Round 5
dapr ShahZaM SicK TenZ |
|
1
Round 5
TenZ |
|
|
|
|
51
|
1
|
0
|
|
NaturE
GEN
|
|
4
Round 11
SicK ShahZaM
Round 18
SicK zombs
Round 19
zombs ShahZaM
Round 20
TenZ SicK |
1
Round 8
zombs ShahZaM TenZ |
|
|
1
Round 8
TenZ |
|
|
|
|
48
|
3
|
0
|
|
koosta
GEN
|
|
3
Round 1
TenZ dapr
Round 2
SicK dapr
Round 18
ShahZaM dapr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
|
1
|
1
|
|
koosta
GEN
|
Shawn12590
GEN
|
gMd
GEN
|
NaturE
GEN
|
MkaeL
GEN
|
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
1
3
-2
|
5
4
+1
|
0
2
-2
|
4
0
+4
|
2
1
+1
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
7
2
+5
|
2
5
-3
|
5
2
+3
|
3
4
-1
|
4
0
+4
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
3
1
+2
|
2
6
-4
|
3
4
-1
|
4
2
+2
|
5
0
+5
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
2
4
-2
|
5
7
-2
|
2
3
-1
|
3
3
+0
|
4
0
+4
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
1
4
-3
|
2
1
+1
|
5
2
+3
|
1
2
-1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
koosta
GEN
|
Shawn12590
GEN
|
gMd
GEN
|
NaturE
GEN
|
MkaeL
GEN
|
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
0
1
-1
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
2
0
+2
|
|
1
0
+1
|
|
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
1
1
+0
|
0
2
-2
|
0
1
-1
|
2
0
+2
|
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
1
4
-3
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
koosta
GEN
|
Shawn12590
GEN
|
gMd
GEN
|
NaturE
GEN
|
MkaeL
GEN
|
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
0
2
-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
0
1
-1
|
|
|
|
|
| 2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
2
Round 18
MkaeL Shawn12590
Round 22
Shawn12590 gMd |
|
1
Round 13
koosta  NaturE MkaeL Shawn12590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
1
|
0
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
3
Round 3
gMd NaturE
Round 9
gMd MkaeL
Round 11
NaturE koosta |
3
Round 10
koosta Shawn12590 MkaeL
Round 14
Shawn12590 NaturE MkaeL
Round 20
koosta gMd MkaeL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55
|
2
|
2
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
|
1
Round 8
NaturE Shawn12590 MkaeL |
|
|
|
1
Round 11
Shawn12590 gMd |
|
|
|
53
|
0
|
0
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
2
Round 1
NaturE gMd
Round 15
gMd MkaeL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
4
|
0
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
5
Round 3
koosta MkaeL
Round 5
NaturE gMd
Round 6
MkaeL Shawn12590
Round 15
NaturE koosta
Round 16
gMd koosta |
1
Round 18
gMd koosta NaturE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
0
|
0
|
|
MkaeL
GEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
3
|
0
|
|
gMd
GEN
|
|
4
Round 2
TenZ zombs
Round 6
SicK dapr
Round 11
zombs SicK
Round 16
TenZ SicK |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
2
|
0
|
|
Shawn12590
GEN
|
|
5
Round 2
SicK ShahZaM
Round 7
TenZ SicK
Round 8
TenZ SicK
Round 11
dapr TenZ
Round 12
SicK dapr |
1
Round 17
TenZ SicK ShahZaM |
|
|
1
Round 16
dapr |
|
|
|
|
90
|
1
|
0
|
|
NaturE
GEN
|
|
2
Round 7
zombs dapr
Round 12
TenZ zombs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
0
|
0
|
|
koosta
GEN
|
|
2
Round 6
ShahZaM zombs
Round 22
TenZ dapr |
|
1
Round 1
SicK zombs TenZ dapr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
0
|
1
|
Head-to-head
VCT NA S1: Challengers 1
LR2
2
1
2021/02/05
JBL Quantum Cup
R1
0
1
2020/12/12
First Strike: NA
QF
0
2
2020/10/28
FaZe Invitational
Group A
2
1
2020/08/06
PAX Invitational
QF
2
1
2020/07/24
Pulse Invitational
SF
1
2
2020/07/12
T1 x NSG Showdown
UBSF
1
0
2020/06/27
T1 x NSG Showdown
Group D
2
0
2020/06/26
Past Matches
schlong [#5]Gen.G win here, then SEN goes on a classic NA lower bracket run and wins the whole thing anyways
No matter what SEN goes deep lmao
FireII [#14]screw my pickems... geng win here, huynh is a tier 3 player who was holding them back
I don't think Huynh is as bad as people say. But I think he does need to open is agent pool because his jett is too inconsistent. Honestly Huynh did carry sometimes and he did carry hard. But he just is too inconsistent. Nature was just a better fit. I think Huynh can fix this consistency issue by playing a more consistent agent like raze or sage but idk. I think Huynh can still be tier 1.5 but I do agree that Huynh was holding them back. But I think it was because he just didn't fit the team.
plas [#10]i genuinely think geng can take this one
Me too. People are thinking that ABX is just worse than they expected. But it's more like GEN.G are just a shit ton more than people expected. My 3 teams that are gonna be reallly good in 3 months were ABX, GEN.G, and C9. C9 fucking somehow look so lost. I honestly don't know wtf they did but yea people didn't even think abt GEN.G. And GEN.G can def take this one.
Asphyxia [#16]I don't think Huynh is as bad as people say. But I think he does need to open is agent pool because his jett is too inconsistent. Honestly Huynh did carry sometimes and he did carry hard. But he just is too inconsistent. Nature was just a better fit. I think Huynh can fix this consistency issue by playing a more consistent agent like raze or sage but idk. I think Huynh can still be tier 1.5 but I do agree that Huynh was holding them back. But I think it was because he just didn't fit the team.
look at huynh's recent stats on ghost. 128 acs on sova, not even against the top tier of teams
FireII [#18]look at huynh's recent stats on ghost. 128 acs on sova, not even against the top tier of teams
oh wait really. KEKW. actually i take back my word. he's shit.
FireII [#18]look at huynh's recent stats on ghost. 128 acs on sova, not even against the top tier of teams
holy shit, even potter is better
SENBobstar [#21]Only way GENG win, is if gMd or Shawn drops 30 both maps
hes so good but he can make some questionable plays for sure. I hope natures igl'ing for them i think they have a chance to win if so
Asphyxia [#16]I don't think Huynh is as bad as people say. But I think he does need to open is agent pool because his jett is too inconsistent. Honestly Huynh did carry sometimes and he did carry hard. But he just is too inconsistent. Nature was just a better fit. I think Huynh can fix this consistency issue by playing a more consistent agent like raze or sage but idk. I think Huynh can still be tier 1.5 but I do agree that Huynh was holding them back. But I think it was because he just didn't fit the team.
Nature does not get a lot of kills. Wrong roster move in my opinion
Sova_Viper_Breach_Cypher [#28]Nature does not get a lot of kills. Wrong roster move in my opinion
He has a wider agent pool and is more consistent overall. He's a good fit for the team because they didn't have that much variety in team comps because they were always restricted to a certain style with huynh when they tried to support huynh but Nature is much more self sufficient.
SENBobstar [#21]Only way GENG win, is if gMd or Shawn drops 30 both maps
GENG beat ABX... Shawn carries GenG
cloud9bluefan [#31]Should be a sen win but they look a little shaky and geng look good so who knows 👀
C9 looked good too...
hacklesacka [#4]rip geng you had a good run
Their run isn’t over, it just goes to lower bracket, unlucky.
5pw423yjmv2 [#35]13-0 both maps for sen
Gen. G is looking good tho, could make it 13-2 both maps, give them a few rounds.
Asphyxia [#29]He has a wider agent pool and is more consistent overall. He's a good fit for the team because they didn't have that much variety in team comps because they were always restricted to a certain style with huynh when they tried to support huynh but Nature is much more self sufficient.
yeah, its in a sense saying zombs should be dropped cuz he doesnt get kils. Nature isnt set up to frag
SENBobstar [#21]Only way GENG win, is if gMd or Shawn drops 30 both maps
I mean shawn can still carry. I think gMd holds his load really well even in games against the top 5 and he's really consistent. Nature has good firepower and is very self sufficient. Mkael looks eh. And Koosta probably is one of the best sentinel players.
Just from a individual point of view. This team could be fine against sentinels. I think that Shawn, Nature, and Koosta all are arguably like top 15 players. And gMd is honestly not that bad. And his omen kinda nasty. I'm not sure abt mkael though.
I think people are underrating GEN.G here. I think GEN.G can definitely take one map off sentinels. Also sentinels have the lose first match kinda thing. Where they start slow lmao. So I wouldn't be surprised.
deadlyclownfish [#44]sinatraa as coach ez sen 2-0 13-0 both maps
sinatraa as coach and they lose to silvers
k1ng1namo [#66]Cmon GENG we need this W for the boys https://twitter.com/plooful/status/1413227563363667968
Who is she
resent [#74]content creator for gen.g
Ok thanks
But why am I getting downvoted from thirsty virgins for not knowing every single streamer 😱
HaSanity [#87]how tf did they blow a 8-0 lead ??????? they have insane mental respect to geng
Fnatic 🤝 Sentinels
Masters finalists blowing leads to tier 3 enemies
raka_gg [#85]Ok thanks
But why am I getting downvoted from thirsty virgins for not knowing every single streamer 😱
ironic
raka_gg [#91]Fnatic 🤝 Sentinels
Masters finalists blowing leads to tier 3 enemies
who is tier 3
raka_gg [#85]Ok thanks
But why am I getting downvoted from thirsty virgins for not knowing every single streamer 😱
u down voted cuz u raka
This thread has been locked.
Discord