8

VALORANT TROPHIES HIERARCHY GUIDE

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
fartnels

1 Champions - S+ (main international event of the season/major, in theory, reunites the best of the best teams of the season from each region, and that's why is above all the other tournaments)
.
2 Masters and Lock/in - S (s-tier international events, not as huge as champions tho, cuz masters has less teams and is a mid-season tourney, just like pro league in CSGO; lock/in was a invitational tournament, these characteristics devalue both masters and lock/in if u compare them to Champions)
.
.
.
3 VCT americas/emea/pacific - A-tier regional events, wich why is above the other 3

thoughts?

#2
Qwertyy
7
Frags
+

LOCK//IN below masters, disagree = stupid

#3
fartnels
2
Frags
+
Qwertyy [#2]

LOCK//IN below masters, disagree = stupid

idk, even though it was an invitational, there were 30 teams competing, and the fact that there are no lower-brackets makes it more competitive, maybe as competitive as masters

#4
Congo1
4
Frags
+

Change regional events to A tier. Then i agree

#5
fartnels
3
Frags
+
Congo1 [#4]

Change regional events to A tier. Then i agree

agreed, done ☝️

#6
Congo1
1
Frags
+
fartnels [#5]

agreed, done ☝️

now its perfect

#7
TheLoque
2
Frags
+
Qwertyy [#2]

LOCK//IN below masters, disagree = stupid

LOCK//IN feels like masters but different format, experimental you might say

#8
fartnels
0
Frags
+
TheLoque [#7]

LOCK//IN feels like masters but different format, experimental you might say

exactly

#9
PINTO0
-1
Frags
+
fartnels [#3]

idk, even though it was an invitational, there were 30 teams competing, and the fact that there are no lower-brackets makes it more competitive, maybe as competitive as masters

it wasn't like masters, becaus teams were just testing they're teams and was like an initiation to the Franchise

#10
PandaZ
0
Frags
+
fartnels [#3]

idk, even though it was an invitational, there were 30 teams competing, and the fact that there are no lower-brackets makes it more competitive, maybe as competitive as masters

I dont think single elim is more competitive especially as it was the first time a lot of the teams were playing with a completely new roster. Double elim is more competitive because it gives teams a second chance after perhaps having an "off game" and losing. Also that single elim format will never be seen again because it was a one time thing

#11
brobeans
-2
Frags
+

S+/-: Champions/Masters
A: leagues
B: lock-in, new events, etc

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment