EXCEL 2-1 G2
EZ predict
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.45 1.33 1.81 | 191 168 262 | 13 9 4 | / 7 5 2 / | 9 5 4 | +6 +4 +2 | 88% 92% 75% | 113 116 103 | 52% 63% 29% | 1 0 1 | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | |
|
1.42 1.54 1.04 | 245 278 148 | 15 12 3 | / 8 6 2 / | 8 8 0 | +7 +6 +1 | 88% 92% 75% | 162 195 60 | 17% 19% 0% | 2 2 0 | 1 0 1 | +1 +2 -1 | |
|
1.21 1.36 0.77 | 276 317 153 | 18 16 2 | / 12 9 3 / | 5 2 3 | +6 +7 -1 | 94% 92% 100% | 174 203 88 | 37% 38% 33% | 1 1 0 | 3 3 0 | -2 -2 0 | |
|
1.17 0.89 1.99 | 225 153 444 | 12 6 6 | / 9 6 3 / | 6 3 3 | +3 0 +3 | 88% 83% 100% | 150 113 260 | 30% 30% 29% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.91 1.12 0.30 | 255 299 124 | 15 13 2 | / 11 8 3 / | 2 1 1 | +4 +5 -1 | 75% 67% 100% | 134 176 9 | 36% 37% 0% | 3 2 1 | 2 2 0 | +1 0 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.16 0.70 1.31 | 232 102 276 | 13 2 11 | / 14 3 11 / | 3 1 2 | -1 -1 0 | 69% 50% 75% | 142 64 168 | 28% 13% 32% | 3 0 3 | 2 0 2 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
0.70 0.28 0.84 | 153 135 160 | 8 1 7 | / 15 4 11 / | 4 3 1 | -7 -3 -4 | 50% 75% 42% | 99 65 110 | 29% 25% 30% | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.70 0.83 0.65 | 173 175 173 | 9 3 6 | / 14 3 11 / | 5 1 4 | -5 0 -5 | 56% 50% 58% | 97 73 105 | 12% 0% 17% | 3 1 2 | 3 0 3 | 0 +1 -1 | |
|
0.65 1.38 0.40 | 155 249 125 | 9 5 4 | / 14 3 11 / | 3 0 3 | -5 +2 -7 | 56% 50% 58% | 90 102 86 | 31% 38% 28% | 1 1 0 | 3 2 1 | -2 -1 -1 | |
|
0.53 0.27 0.61 | 178 178 179 | 8 2 6 | / 16 4 12 / | 4 1 3 | -8 -2 -6 | 56% 50% 58% | 100 32 123 | 15% 0% 18% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.88 1.05 1.65 | 284 320 195 | 36 28 8 | / 16 10 6 / | 13 11 2 | +20 +18 +2 | 82% 88% 67% | 181 210 103 | 22% 22% 23% | 4 4 0 | 2 1 1 | +2 +3 -1 | |
|
1.35 2.04 1.54 | 253 222 343 | 32 21 11 | / 15 12 3 / | 14 8 6 | +17 +9 +8 | 91% 92% 89% | 138 139 133 | 40% 42% 35% | 2 0 2 | 1 0 1 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.20 0.91 1.12 | 251 261 223 | 32 25 7 | / 22 16 6 / | 9 6 3 | +10 +9 +1 | 85% 83% 89% | 167 185 120 | 28% 25% 41% | 3 2 1 | 5 5 0 | -2 -3 +1 | |
|
0.82 1.40 0.98 | 186 138 309 | 21 12 9 | / 18 13 5 / | 8 5 3 | +3 -1 +4 | 85% 83% 89% | 105 94 137 | 25% 24% 26% | 5 3 2 | 1 1 0 | +4 +2 +2 | |
|
0.66 0.56 0.63 | 186 209 117 | 23 18 5 | / 24 19 5 / | 5 2 3 | -1 -1 0 | 58% 50% 78% | 100 125 33 | 24% 29% 0% | 5 4 1 | 5 4 1 | 0 0 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.56 0.95 0.85 | 173 98 199 | 17 3 14 | / 29 8 21 / | 9 3 6 | -12 -5 -7 | 67% 56% 71% | 106 47 128 | 23% 8% 27% | 3 0 3 | 4 0 4 | -1 0 -1 | |
|
0.13 1.02 0.76 | 187 88 224 | 19 2 17 | / 29 9 20 / | 8 2 6 | -10 -7 -3 | 61% 56% 63% | 103 23 134 | 20% 17% 21% | 4 0 4 | 3 1 2 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
0.41 0.88 0.75 | 167 165 168 | 18 4 14 | / 30 9 21 / | 7 3 4 | -12 -5 -7 | 55% 67% 50% | 104 90 109 | 27% 26% 28% | 2 0 2 | 1 1 0 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
1.16 0.60 0.75 | 176 214 164 | 21 9 12 | / 27 7 20 / | 9 1 8 | -6 +2 -8 | 61% 56% 63% | 106 65 121 | 22% 19% 23% | 1 1 0 | 7 3 4 | -6 -2 -4 | |
|
1.00 0.66 0.75 | 178 216 165 | 20 7 13 | / 29 7 22 / | 7 2 5 | -9 0 -9 | 64% 67% 63% | 106 109 105 | 20% 9% 26% | 4 2 2 | 4 1 3 | 0 +1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1.87 2.21 1.06 | 323 362 234 | 21 16 5 | / 8 4 4 / | 5 3 2 | +13 +12 +1 | 76% 83% 60% | 199 225 136 | 27% 26% 29% | 2 2 0 | 1 1 0 | +1 +1 0 | |
|
1.62 1.36 2.23 | 314 276 407 | 19 12 7 | / 8 7 1 / | 5 3 2 | +11 +5 +6 | 94% 92% 100% | 161 162 158 | 33% 31% 38% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |
|
1.03 1.04 1.01 | 226 205 279 | 14 9 5 | / 10 7 3 / | 4 4 0 | +4 +2 +2 | 76% 75% 80% | 161 167 147 | 22% 16% 45% | 2 1 1 | 2 2 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.80 0.75 0.94 | 146 124 202 | 9 6 3 | / 9 7 2 / | 2 2 0 | 0 -1 +1 | 82% 83% 80% | 64 74 39 | 17% 17% 17% | 4 2 2 | 0 0 0 | +4 +2 +2 | |
|
0.36 0.19 0.76 | 116 118 112 | 8 5 3 | / 13 11 2 / | 3 1 2 | -5 -6 +1 | 41% 33% 60% | 68 74 53 | 12% 17% 0% | 2 2 0 | 3 2 1 | -1 0 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
0.98 0.02 1.42 | 195 16 270 | 11 0 11 | / 13 5 8 / | 4 1 3 | -2 -5 +3 | 65% 60% 67% | 107 16 145 | 25% 100% 23% | 3 0 3 | 3 1 2 | 0 -1 +1 | |
|
0.85 0.98 0.79 | 197 186 202 | 12 4 8 | / 13 4 9 / | 6 1 5 | -1 0 -1 | 65% 60% 67% | 121 36 156 | 17% 0% 21% | 0 0 0 | 4 1 3 | -4 -1 -3 | |
|
0.80 1.13 0.66 | 183 248 157 | 11 4 7 | / 15 4 11 / | 2 1 1 | -4 0 -4 | 71% 80% 67% | 114 138 104 | 28% 17% 38% | 1 1 0 | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | |
|
0.80 0.51 0.92 | 180 189 176 | 10 3 7 | / 15 5 10 / | 3 0 3 | -5 -2 -3 | 59% 60% 58% | 109 110 109 | 26% 27% 26% | 2 0 2 | 1 1 0 | +1 -1 +2 | |
|
0.55 0.45 0.60 | 113 95 122 | 4 1 3 | / 15 5 10 / | 6 2 4 | -11 -4 -7 | 65% 60% 67% | 71 33 87 | 15% 0% 19% | 0 0 0 | 2 0 2 | -2 0 -2 |
ArgieGR8ArgieB8ArgieM8 [#3]G2 will be the laughing stock of the earth if they lose this.
xl arent looking too bad, if ale beats out nukkye it could be a problem...
(avova has hasbulla buff so they still prob wont win)
Glycoroldas [#5]It's not even EXCEL vs G2, it's UCAM vs G2 OMEGALUL
who expected excel? just because they are a known org? this was their first official tourney after changes and those changes weren't particularly groundbreaking.
ArgieGR8ArgieB8ArgieM8 [#9]who expected excel? just because they are a known org? this was their first official tourney after changes and those changes weren't particularly groundbreaking.
On paper excel have better individuals(or at least more known) than ucam, therefore that should have been enough for excel to stroll through. However, it seems that ucam managed to beat excel through better team cohesion to an extent where superiority of excel individuals was not that much of a factor anymore
Glycoroldas [#11]On paper excel have better individuals(or at least more known) than ucam, therefore that should have been enough for excel to stroll through. However, it seems that ucam managed to beat excel through better team cohesion to an extent where superiority of excel individuals was not that much of a factor anymore
With the case of excel, in my opinion, they're not that insane on paper, they're just decent(when it comes to top32 territory). Don't feel like calling out anyone in specific, but just look at the history of some of these players and you'll know what I'm saying.
ArgieGR8ArgieB8ArgieM8 [#14]With the case of excel, in my opinion, they're not that insane on paper, they're just decent(when it comes to top32 territory). Don't feel like calling out anyone in specific, but just look at the history of some of these players and you'll know what I'm saying.
Yeah you're right, I fell for known name bias. The players on excel were usually the ones that would get kicked and after the kicks those respective teams all of a sudden would become much better.
Scar98 [#17]Mixwell is truly playing every agent, damn...
Teams like G2 will be highly benefited in the future with agent bans, they have a wide pool
The Avova play was simply dirty, I love it.
https://clips.twitch.tv/CogentEncouragingSowAMPEnergy-hRi2RFVRqFSB2huD
Pristyna [#30]link the clip for nukkye's play?
https://www.twitch.tv/blackelespanolito/clip/LuckyTransparentGoblinDAESuppy-XgYRvHkZexg-kaSH