threw 4 rounds nice
2
liqud wtf
posted in
General Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
HadEs_In [#2]Fnc just winning them convincingly not even throw at this point
they easily win early round but throw even with man advantage
HadEs_In [#2]Fnc just winning them convincingly not even throw at this point
Winning 2v4 is not "convincingly", just liquid throwing
Jeffo [#5]Winning 2v4 is not "convincingly", just liquid throwing
They are literally losing aim duels how are those not convincing in a tactical fps game
HadEs_In [#6]They are literally losing aim duels how are those not convincing in a tactical fps game
They're winning the 5v5 aim duels and gettin in a 4v2, even with bad aim you should win a 4v2, you just don't know what you're talking about nor what convincingly means
HadEs_In [#6]They are literally losing aim duels how are those not convincing in a tactical fps game
they were separating and holding aggro angles in man advantages instead of falling back and playing safe its not about losing duels
Jeffo [#7]They're winning the 5v5 aim duels and gettin in a 4v2, even with bad aim you should win a 4v2, you just don't know what you're talking about nor what convincingly means
They are winning based of off their setups in 5v5 but engaging in unnecessary aim duels when they are in advantage by getting cocky
hence losing aim duels which are convincing enough from fnc side
hell_on_earth [#10]they were separating and holding aggro angles in man advantages instead of falling back and playing safe its not about losing duels
They were losing h2h battles by bad peek timing is that not losing aim duels?
Aim duels are not just crosshair placement , I presented the concept of it as a whole
HadEs_In [#13]They were losing h2h battles by bad peek timing is that not losing aim duels?
Aim duels are not just crosshair placement , I presented the concept of it as a whole
in a man advantage it shouldnt matter if you lose an aim duel because you should get traded.
Discord