Its not better to lose cuz if you win first match, you essentially have 2 qualifying games/chances for tokyo compared to only one.
FUT can win 1 of the next two games to reach Tokyo while Giants HAVE to win next game
Disregarding strength of opponents, FUT have a 75% chance for Tokyo and giants have 50% chance
This is a logical fallacy
Asuna_Yuuki [#2]Its not better to lose cuz if you win first match, you essentially have 2 qualifying games/chances for tokyo compared to only one.
FUT can win 1 of the next two games to reach Tokyo while Giants HAVE to win next game
Disregarding strength of opponents, FUT have a 75% chance for Tokyo and giants have 50% chance
This is a logical fallacy
I get where you're coming from, but I think you're missing a crucial factor here - the skill discrepancy. When you're up against FNC and navi, the odds aren't the same as facing FUT and VIT. Winning the first match does give you more chances, but those chances aren't equal. It's like tossing a loaded dice - sure, you get more throws, but some outcomes are much more likely than others, and FNC and NAVI have shown their dominance enough to disprove your 50% chance to win theory.
having an extra day to prepare and study the top-seeded teams's strategies after losing the first match is also be a significant advantage. It gives teams an opportunity to learn from their mistakes, adapt, and come back stronger in LR1. this is more than just simple math - it's about strategy, preparation, and adaptation to qualify for tokyo.
h786 [#5]no just 1L 1W - UR1 lose, LR1 Win = top 4
https://www.vlr.gg/213201/tbd-champions-tour-2023-emea-league-lr2
so this match already qual min top 4?
Chow1E [#6]https://www.vlr.gg/213201/tbd-champions-tour-2023-emea-league-lr2
so this match already qual min top 4?
yes, these 2 teams are already qualified.