my first post in this thread: #33 --> never mentioned rrq
ur first response to me: #35 --> u said GE improved since lock-in
my next arguement: #42 --> first time I bring up RRQ since YOU have mentioned it above not ME: I asked you that rrq is 2-2 while GE is 1-4, and that you think GE has improved but RRQ hasn't, and is a big fraud team
ur counterarguement: half of it is complaining that I "KEEP" mentioning RRQ while i only have done it once, other half aruged that GE learns more and improves more by versing DRX and losing than RRQ versing DFM and winning (which is true)
next: #44 --> because ur other half is true that GE learns more, I said nothing about that, but said that the current scoreboard tells that RRQ is a better team; i even mentioned that GE might place higher than RRQ at the end to make sure that my point isn't RRQ being superior, just that u saying GE imporved and RRQ hasn't since lock-in is wrong
next: #45: --> u got left with nothing valid to say, so you tried to act cool by pretending u "don't" want to aruge
next: #47 --> I fixed ur statement
next: #56 --> bro got triggered so bad that bro brought up the "YOU KEEP MENTIONING RRQ" arguement although the truth is that I mentioned it once.
I bet u will just either ignore me or say "aint reading all that" after reading my post