Disguised vs. TSM | Challengers League: North America | Split 2 | Valorant match

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
riku DSG	0.89 0.65 0.97	169 158 173	10 2 8	/ 14 4 10 /	2 1 1	-4 -2 -2	63% 50% 67%	105 97 108	19% 0% 26%	0 0 0	0 0 0	0 0 0
nerve DSG	0.67 0.42 0.75	163 158 166	8 2 6	/ 14 4 10 /	1 0 1	-6 -2 -4	44% 50% 42%	115 95 121	36% 29% 39%	2 1 1	2 0 2	0 +1 -1
yay DSG	0.54 0.01 0.86	150 14 196	8 0 8	/ 14 4 10 /	0 0 0	-6 -4 -2	56% 25% 67%	85 14 108	40% 0% 43%	2 0 2	3 3 0	-1 -3 +2
Exalt DSG	0.40 0.17 0.48	79 62 86	4 1 3	/ 13 4 9 /	4 0 4	-9 -3 -6	56% 50% 58%	50 36 55	5% 0% 6%	0 0 0	2 0 2	-2 0 -2
clear DSG	0.36 0.44 0.34	160 139 167	6 1 5	/ 16 4 12 /	6 2 4	-10 -3 -7	63% 75% 58%	119 102 125	12% 9% 13%	1 0 1	4 0 4	-3 0 -3

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

riku

DSG

0.89 0.65 0.97

169 158 173

10 2 8

/ 14 4 10 /

2 1 1

-4 -2 -2

63% 50% 67%

105 97 108

19% 0% 26%

0 0 0

nerve

DSG

0.67 0.42 0.75

163 158 166

8 2 6

/ 14 4 10 /

1 0 1

-6 -2 -4

44% 50% 42%

115 95 121

36% 29% 39%

2 1 1

2 0 2

0 +1 -1

yay

DSG

0.54 0.01 0.86

150 14 196

8 0 8

/ 14 4 10 /

0 0 0

-6 -4 -2

56% 25% 67%

85 14 108

40% 0% 43%

2 0 2

3 3 0

-1 -3 +2

Exalt

DSG

0.40 0.17 0.48

79 62 86

4 1 3

/ 13 4 9 /

4 0 4

-9 -3 -6

56% 50% 58%

50 36 55

5% 0% 6%

0 0 0

2 0 2

-2 0 -2

clear

DSG

0.36 0.44 0.34

160 139 167

6 1 5

/ 16 4 12 /

6 2 4

-10 -3 -7

63% 75% 58%

119 102 125

12% 9% 13%

1 0 1

4 0 4

-3 0 -3

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
NaturE TSM	1.91 1.79 2.29	311 298 351	19 13 6	/ 5 4 1 /	1 1 0	+14 +9 +5	94% 92% 100%	193 181 228	26% 26% 28%	5 4 1	0 0 0	+5 +4 +1
corey TSM	1.39 1.24 1.87	252 216 363	15 10 5	/ 8 7 1 /	4 3 1	+7 +3 +4	94% 92% 100%	170 156 211	31% 33% 27%	2 2 0	1 1 0	+1 +1 0
seven TSM	1.37 1.30 1.61	236 230 258	15 11 4	/ 7 6 1 /	2 2 0	+8 +5 +3	81% 83% 75%	146 139 168	17% 14% 29%	3 2 1	3 2 1	0 0 0
Kanpeki TSM	1.33 1.16 1.86	216 186 308	13 8 5	/ 8 6 2 /	15 12 3	+5 +2 +3	88% 83% 100%	114 101 154	35% 42% 28%	1 0 1	1 1 0	0 -1 +1
gMd TSM	1.00 1.10 0.68	153 201 13	9 9 0	/ 8 7 1 /	6 5 1	+1 +2 -1	88% 83% 100%	111 146 7	36% 38% 0%	0 0 0	0 0 0	0 0 0

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

NaturE

TSM

1.91 1.79 2.29

311 298 351

19 13 6

/ 5 4 1 /

1 1 0

+14 +9 +5

94% 92% 100%

193 181 228

26% 26% 28%

5 4 1

0 0 0

+5 +4 +1

corey

TSM

1.39 1.24 1.87

252 216 363

15 10 5

/ 8 7 1 /

4 3 1

+7 +3 +4

94% 92% 100%

170 156 211

31% 33% 27%

2 2 0

1 1 0

+1 +1 0

seven

TSM

1.37 1.30 1.61

236 230 258

15 11 4

/ 7 6 1 /

2 2 0

+8 +5 +3

81% 83% 75%

146 139 168

17% 14% 29%

3 2 1

0 0 0

Kanpeki

TSM

1.33 1.16 1.86

216 186 308

13 8 5

/ 8 6 2 /

15 12 3

+5 +2 +3

88% 83% 100%

114 101 154

35% 42% 28%

1 0 1

1 1 0

0 -1 +1

gMd

TSM

1.00 1.10 0.68

153 201 13

9 9 0

/ 8 7 1 /

6 5 1

+1 +2 -1

88% 83% 100%

111 146 7

36% 38% 0%

0 0 0

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
clear DSG	0.73 1.20 1.04	244 181 296	29 7 22	/ 33 12 21 /	12 5 7	-4 -5 +1	59% 62% 58%	178 122 208	25% 21% 26%	3 1 2	7 2 5	-4 -1 -3
riku DSG	0.70 0.89 0.82	151 140 153	21 6 15	/ 30 11 19 /	8 5 3	-9 -5 -4	57% 54% 58%	95 91 98	27% 15% 34%	1 0 1	3 2 1	-2 -2 0
nerve DSG	0.72 0.56 0.61	139 159 124	16 8 8	/ 31 12 19 /	2 0 2	-15 -4 -11	46% 46% 46%	97 105 93	33% 50% 26%	4 1 3	4 1 3	0 0 0
Exalt DSG	0.65 0.55 0.58	112 108 121	12 4 8	/ 30 11 19 /	15 5 10	-18 -7 -11	68% 69% 67%	80 71 85	24% 16% 29%	1 1 0	3 0 3	-2 +1 -3
yay DSG	0.23 0.76 0.53	128 91 144	15 4 11	/ 31 13 18 /	8 1 7	-16 -9 -7	57% 54% 58%	79 63 87	32% 50% 28%	3 1 2	8 4 4	-5 -3 -2

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

clear

DSG

0.73 1.20 1.04

244 181 296

29 7 22

/ 33 12 21 /

12 5 7

-4 -5 +1

59% 62% 58%

178 122 208

25% 21% 26%

3 1 2

7 2 5

-4 -1 -3

riku

DSG

0.70 0.89 0.82

151 140 153

21 6 15

/ 30 11 19 /

8 5 3

-9 -5 -4

57% 54% 58%

95 91 98

27% 15% 34%

1 0 1

3 2 1

-2 -2 0

nerve

DSG

0.72 0.56 0.61

139 159 124

16 8 8

/ 31 12 19 /

2 0 2

-15 -4 -11

46% 46% 46%

97 105 93

33% 50% 26%

4 1 3

0 0 0

Exalt

DSG

0.65 0.55 0.58

112 108 121

12 4 8

/ 30 11 19 /

15 5 10

-18 -7 -11

68% 69% 67%

80 71 85

24% 16% 29%

1 1 0

3 0 3

-2 +1 -3

yay

DSG

0.23 0.76 0.53

128 91 144

15 4 11

/ 31 13 18 /

8 1 7

-16 -9 -7

57% 54% 58%

79 63 87

32% 50% 28%

3 1 2

8 4 4

-5 -3 -2

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
corey TSM	1.60 1.45 1.55	304 323 290	40 28 12	/ 19 13 6 /	11 8 3	+21 +15 +6	86% 88% 85%	198 207 181	27% 33% 21%	7 6 1	6 4 2	+1 +2 -1
NaturE TSM	1.47 1.60 1.52	284 270 300	36 21 15	/ 17 11 6 /	8 5 3	+19 +10 +9	92% 88% 100%	178 175 184	19% 22% 14%	10 7 3	0 0 0	+10 +7 +3
Kanpeki TSM	1.23 1.50 1.33	227 201 282	33 18 15	/ 20 13 7 /	23 17 6	+13 +5 +8	86% 88% 85%	137 123 164	32% 33% 31%	2 0 2	1 1 0	+1 -1 +2
gMd TSM	0.85 1.52 1.08	162 140 207	22 12 10	/ 19 15 4 /	21 17 4	+3 -3 +6	92% 88% 100%	99 89 116	43% 34% 52%	2 0 2	0 0 0	+2 0 +2
seven TSM	1.12 0.76 1.00	170 184 118	24 17 7	/ 19 13 6 /	4 4 0	+5 +4 +1	84% 92% 69%	101 118 71	19% 19% 21%	4 3 1	5 3 2	-1 0 -1

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

corey

TSM

1.60 1.45 1.55

304 323 290

40 28 12

/ 19 13 6 /

11 8 3

+21 +15 +6

86% 88% 85%

198 207 181

27% 33% 21%

7 6 1

6 4 2

+1 +2 -1

NaturE

TSM

1.47 1.60 1.52

284 270 300

36 21 15

/ 17 11 6 /

8 5 3

+19 +10 +9

92% 88% 100%

178 175 184

19% 22% 14%

10 7 3

0 0 0

+10 +7 +3

Kanpeki

TSM

1.23 1.50 1.33

227 201 282

33 18 15

/ 20 13 7 /

23 17 6

+13 +5 +8

86% 88% 85%

137 123 164

32% 33% 31%

2 0 2

1 1 0

+1 -1 +2

gMd

TSM

0.85 1.52 1.08

162 140 207

22 12 10

/ 19 15 4 /

21 17 4

+3 -3 +6

92% 88% 100%

99 89 116

43% 34% 52%

2 0 2

0 0 0

+2 0 +2

seven

TSM

1.12 0.76 1.00

170 184 118

24 17 7

/ 19 13 6 /

4 4 0

+5 +4 +1

84% 92% 69%

101 118 71

19% 19% 21%

4 3 1

5 3 2

-1 0 -1

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
clear DSG	1.55 0.85 2.07	328 200 425	23 6 17	/ 17 8 9 /	6 3 3	+6 -2 +8	57% 56% 58%	223 131 292	33% 28% 36%	2 1 1	3 2 1	-1 -1 0
riku DSG	0.78 0.72 0.82	132 131 134	11 4 7	/ 16 7 9 /	6 4 2	-5 -3 -2	52% 56% 50%	88 89 87	36% 25% 50%	1 0 1	3 2 1	-2 -2 0
Exalt DSG	0.72 0.87 0.61	144 128 156	8 3 5	/ 17 7 10 /	11 5 6	-9 -4 -5	76% 78% 75%	103 87 116	34% 19% 47%	1 1 0	1 0 1	0 +1 -1
nerve DSG	0.57 0.85 0.37	114 159 81	8 6 2	/ 17 8 9 /	1 0 1	-9 -2 -7	48% 44% 50%	84 109 64	30% 71% 15%	2 0 2	2 1 1	0 -1 +1
yay DSG	0.52 0.33 0.65	106 126 92	7 4 3	/ 17 9 8 /	8 1 7	-10 -5 -5	57% 67% 50%	74 84 66	27% 57% 13%	1 1 0	5 1 4	-4 0 -4

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

clear

DSG

1.55 0.85 2.07

328 200 425

23 6 17

/ 17 8 9 /

6 3 3

+6 -2 +8

57% 56% 58%

223 131 292

33% 28% 36%

2 1 1

3 2 1

-1 -1 0

riku

DSG

0.78 0.72 0.82

132 131 134

11 4 7

/ 16 7 9 /

6 4 2

-5 -3 -2

52% 56% 50%

88 89 87

36% 25% 50%

1 0 1

3 2 1

-2 -2 0

Exalt

DSG

0.72 0.87 0.61

144 128 156

8 3 5

/ 17 7 10 /

11 5 6

-9 -4 -5

76% 78% 75%

103 87 116

34% 19% 47%

1 1 0

1 0 1

0 +1 -1

nerve

DSG

0.57 0.85 0.37

114 159 81

8 6 2

/ 17 8 9 /

1 0 1

-9 -2 -7

48% 44% 50%

84 109 64

30% 71% 15%

2 0 2

2 1 1

0 -1 +1

yay

DSG

0.52 0.33 0.65

106 126 92

7 4 3

/ 17 9 8 /

8 1 7

-10 -5 -5

57% 67% 50%

74 84 66

27% 57% 13%

1 1 0

5 1 4

-4 0 -4

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
corey TSM	1.67 1.97 1.26	356 431 257	25 18 7	/ 11 6 5 /	7 5 2	+14 +12 +2	81% 83% 78%	220 259 168	26% 33% 17%	5 4 1	5 3 2	0 +1 -1
Kanpeki TSM	1.32 1.31 1.34	238 215 271	20 10 10	/ 12 7 5 /	8 5 3	+8 +3 +5	86% 92% 78%	154 144 168	31% 28% 33%	1 0 1	0 0 0	+1 0 +1
NaturE TSM	1.22 1.16 1.29	257 242 278	17 8 9	/ 12 7 5 /	7 4 3	+5 +1 +4	90% 83% 100%	167 168 164	14% 20% 8%	5 3 2	0 0 0	+5 +3 +2
gMd TSM	1.14 0.59 1.89	170 79 294	13 3 10	/ 11 8 3 /	15 12 3	+2 -5 +7	95% 92% 100%	89 32 165	47% 25% 54%	2 0 2	0 0 0	+2 0 +2
seven TSM	0.71 0.95 0.38	103 139 56	9 6 3	/ 12 7 5 /	2 2 0	-3 -1 -2	86% 100% 67%	68 97 28	23% 27% 14%	1 1 0	2 1 1	-1 0 -1

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

corey

TSM

1.67 1.97 1.26

356 431 257

25 18 7

/ 11 6 5 /

7 5 2

+14 +12 +2

81% 83% 78%

220 259 168

26% 33% 17%

5 4 1

5 3 2

0 +1 -1

Kanpeki

TSM

1.32 1.31 1.34

238 215 271

20 10 10

/ 12 7 5 /

8 5 3

+8 +3 +5

86% 92% 78%

154 144 168

31% 28% 33%

1 0 1

0 0 0

+1 0 +1

NaturE

TSM

1.22 1.16 1.29

257 242 278

17 8 9

/ 12 7 5 /

7 4 3

+5 +1 +4

90% 83% 100%

167 168 164

14% 20% 8%

5 3 2

0 0 0

+5 +3 +2

gMd

TSM

1.14 0.59 1.89

170 79 294

13 3 10

/ 11 8 3 /

15 12 3

+2 -5 +7

95% 92% 100%

89 32 165

47% 25% 54%

2 0 2

0 0 0

+2 0 +2

seven

TSM

0.71 0.95 0.38

103 139 56

9 6 3

/ 12 7 5 /

2 2 0

-3 -1 -2

86% 100% 67%

68 97 28

23% 27% 14%

1 1 0

2 1 1

-1 0 -1

#13

MourninggStarr

Frags

–

The whole team is paycheck stealing from breadman

#15

crashhacker1

Frags

–

they look so unco-ordinated? even if you ignore the defense side, atleast your attack side should look in sync right? what are they praccing?

#18

bud679

Frags

–

their practice is the matches

#16

koromast

Frags

–

disguised cooking toast´s funds 🔥💥🍞🩹🩸🚫❌💵

#17

batchestingveryhard

Frags

–

the last dance

#19

OGBabyboy

Frags

–

13/3 is crazy

#20

washeddiamondbot

Frags

–

so we can clearly say now yay was an Chamber/Operator abuser and is at all overrated as fuck

#21

koromast

-4

Frags

–

https://www.vlr.gg/event/stats/466/valorant-champions-tour-stage-3-masters-berlin

#22

dapada

Frags

–

Damn almost 2 years ago :o
I still remember those days where Jett was the most broken agent with her dash and knives capability

#23

koromast

-6

Frags

–

if it was broken and he is bad why he on top? why no other jett could be there instead of him?

#26

brahianv

Frags

–

Nobody cares about 2 years stats its the same thing with tenz the level that matters is the one that is played now.

#27

dapada

Frags

–

bro you just assuming things
nowhere did I say he is bad, I'm just saying Jett was the most broken agent back in those days🤷🏻‍♂️

#24

WinterZ

Frags

–

no steel = no win

#28

half-evil

Frags

–

0.54 rating KEK

#29

Sita_MOE

Frags

–

chamber main exposed again and again
vlrs still simp y0y someway
shownu was right

#30

An_dH

Frags

–

0,54😭
Even bottsi got better rating (0,64)

#31

PootisSpencerHere

Frags

–

botsii kkkkkkkkkkkk

#32

PootisSpencerHere

Frags

–

downfall of yay... shouldve paid himself to NRG for his big payout.. no way he is getting into tier 1 team with this performance kkkkkkk

#33

MythgoD

Frags

–

Yay is getting so bad
I think now he should stop chasing a bag and join a team which suits him or it's getting late

#35

ValdemieGC

Frags

–

It's looking real bad since he can only play Jett and Sage on 2 maps. Idk if any team would be interested in a player with such an agentpool. He really fell off since the chamber nerf

#36

kickstar

Frags

–

There are quite a lot of Jett 1 tricks in the League system. So i dont think that should be an issue

#42

1king

Frags

–

It wouldn't be as bad if Yay was able to continue looking like the statistical anomaly he was in 2021 playing only Jett.

Unfortunately, his team's coordination and his individual form looked so bad that the highest rated Jett player from Master Berlin looks like a significantly worse pickup for a Tier1 org than getting any cracked upcoming t2 t3 Jett player that you could get for 10% of the cost like Reddux or demon1.

#39

mysterii

Frags

–

he is still good he just also needs a good team

#41

Shownu

Frags

–

Why? Good players are meant to carry mediocre/bad teams to wins. Unless you are saying he is average without Optic core👀

#43

1king

Frags

–

Yeah.. he had incredible stats on Jett while on ABX, but also never won anything significant on there either.. maybe it really was the Optic core that carried him and not the other way around 🤷🏿‍♂️

#46

yungbasel

Frags

–

pre nerf jett btw.

not saying yay is shit. He's insane. But his achievements have an asterix on them if he can't perform consistently in a post chamber world.

#34

proud_bandwagoners

Frags

–

damn yay

#38

Heineck

Frags

–

I don't know what they were expecting they dropped their IGL midway through the split

#44

1king

Frags

–

Yeah, benching steel cuz he was playing Vanity who knows him doesn't even make sense to me... So... You instead yolo it for the rest of the split??

#40

Shownu

Frags

–

y0y is finished. No Chamber no win.

#47

s0raval

Frags

–

DSG got the yay Nerf in Split 2.