1) FNC 8 -1 (16-6)
2) NAVI 7 - 2 (15-4)
2) KOI 7 - 2 (15-6)
4) BBL 6-3 (14-9)
5) TL 5-4 (10-15)
6) GIA - 4-5 (11-13)
7) VIT 3-6 (8-14)
7) KC 3-6 (11-12)
9) TH 2-7 (6-15)
10) FUT 0-9 (2-18)
I'll upload the aggregate later
tttangent [#4]what are the parentheses? i thought they were map differential but it's impossible for TL to be 5-4 and 6-15 in maps
Guess it should be 15-6
Kiklop [#6]Guess it should be 15-6
that's also not possible, if they lose 4 games they have to lose at least 8 maps
tttangent [#4]what are the parentheses? i thought they were map differential but it's impossible for TL to be 5-4 and 6-15 in maps
yup
tttangent [#7]that's also not possible, if they lose 4 games they have to lose at least 8 maps
W
other vro just instantly replied, but he didnt use logic
hey @OP, you edited TL's map record to be 10-15 but that still doesn't add up with them being 5-4. even if all 5 of their wins are 2-1 (5 map losses) they'll still only have 8 map losses from the 4 losses, which only adds up to 13. also, you have 108 total map wins and 112 map losses which doesn't work. you could change TL's map prediction to be 10-11 to fix both problems though
tttangent [#10]hey @OP, you edited TL's map record to be 10-15 but that still doesn't add up with them being 5-4. even if all 5 of their wins are 2-1 (5 map losses) they'll still only have 8 map losses from the 4 losses, which only adds up to 13. also, you have 108 total map wins and 112 map losses which doesn't work. you could change TL's map prediction to be 10-11 to fix both problems though
i got downvoted for being right
you literally cannot be 10-15 in maps with a 5-4 record, it is not possible since you can only lose 1 map at most in each of your wins and 2 maps in each of your losses. 5 + (4 * 2) = 13 is elementary school math guys