As I see it its like playing all in in poker all the time. Thats of course a hyperboly. Somebody will win but strategy and mind games are out of the window. In practice nobody is able to maintain their economy, generally if you win a round, you get additional buy round whenever you lose, if you lose a round you get to eco with pistols, not much variance here especially in back to back rounds. So the question is does it makes sense and does it promote the things you should in the whole game system. Of course some people like "all in" high stake sense more than others, some people would really enjoy only all in poker matches as well but does it make sense to have that when you have more variables which would make a game more interesting to watch/play but they are being not used to their full potential due to limitations from other aspects of the game.