NRG Esports vs. Sentinels | Champions Tour North America Stage 2: Challengers 2 | Main Event | Valorant match

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
eeiu NRG	1.32 1.67 1.08	241 277 217	17 9 8	/ 15 5 10 /	6 2 4	+2 +4 -2	65% 63% 67%	175 201 157	23% 33% 17%	1 0 1	0 0 0	+1 0 +1
daps NRG	0.83 0.91 0.77	201 247 172	14 6 8	/ 17 7 10 /	5 3 2	-3 -1 -2	60% 63% 58%	109 127 97	30% 27% 35%	3 1 2	4 0 4	-1 +1 -2
ANDROID NRG	0.76 0.03 1.28	220 104 298	14 3 11	/ 18 8 10 /	3 0 3	-4 -5 +1	60% 50% 67%	162 63 228	31% 29% 32%	0 0 0	4 3 1	-4 -3 -1
s0m NRG	0.75 0.63 0.83	165 125 192	12 4 8	/ 16 6 10 /	1 1 0	-4 -2 -2	55% 50% 58%	99 90 105	27% 14% 37%	1 0 1	2 1 1	-1 -1 0
tex NRG	0.61 0.80 0.49	159 198 134	9 4 5	/ 18 7 11 /	4 3 1	-9 -3 -6	60% 75% 50%	110 149 85	31% 28% 36%	1 0 1	4 3 1	-3 -3 0

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

eeiu

NRG

1.32 1.67 1.08

241 277 217

17 9 8

/ 15 5 10 /

6 2 4

+2 +4 -2

65% 63% 67%

175 201 157

23% 33% 17%

1 0 1

0 0 0

+1 0 +1

daps

NRG

0.83 0.91 0.77

201 247 172

14 6 8

/ 17 7 10 /

5 3 2

-3 -1 -2

60% 63% 58%

109 127 97

30% 27% 35%

3 1 2

4 0 4

-1 +1 -2

ANDROID

NRG

0.76 0.03 1.28

220 104 298

14 3 11

/ 18 8 10 /

3 0 3

-4 -5 +1

60% 50% 67%

162 63 228

31% 29% 32%

0 0 0

4 3 1

-4 -3 -1

s0m

NRG

0.75 0.63 0.83

165 125 192

12 4 8

/ 16 6 10 /

1 1 0

-4 -2 -2

55% 50% 58%

99 90 105

27% 14% 37%

1 0 1

2 1 1

-1 -1 0

tex

NRG

0.61 0.80 0.49

159 198 134

9 4 5

/ 18 7 11 /

4 3 1

-9 -3 -6

60% 75% 50%

110 149 85

31% 28% 36%

1 0 1

4 3 1

-3 -3 0

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
TenZ SEN	1.29 1.57 0.86	251 298 181	18 13 5	/ 11 6 5 /	5 3 2	+7 +7 0	85% 92% 75%	163 188 126	14% 17% 10%	2 2 0	2 1 1	0 +1 -1
dapr SEN	1.16 0.80 1.71	238 172 339	17 7 10	/ 13 8 5 /	8 4 4	+4 -1 +5	75% 67% 88%	141 124 167	24% 20% 26%	3 0 3	2 2 0	+1 -2 +3
zombs SEN	1.16 1.22 1.07	222 250 180	17 12 5	/ 13 8 5 /	3 0 3	+4 +4 0	75% 67% 88%	141 159 113	12% 16% 4%	0 0 0	0 0 0	0 0 0
SicK SEN	1.12 1.21 0.98	224 237 205	15 9 6	/ 12 7 5 /	9 6 3	+3 +2 +1	85% 92% 75%	152 204 74	31% 39% 8%	3 1 2	1 1 0	+2 0 +2
ShahZaM SEN	0.98 0.81 1.23	252 236 279	17 10 7	/ 17 11 6 /	4 2 2	0 -1 +1	95% 100% 88%	138 143 130	25% 18% 36%	6 4 2	1 1 0	+5 +3 +2

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

TenZ

SEN

1.29 1.57 0.86

251 298 181

18 13 5

/ 11 6 5 /

5 3 2

+7 +7 0

85% 92% 75%

163 188 126

14% 17% 10%

2 2 0

2 1 1

0 +1 -1

dapr

SEN

1.16 0.80 1.71

238 172 339

17 7 10

/ 13 8 5 /

8 4 4

+4 -1 +5

75% 67% 88%

141 124 167

24% 20% 26%

3 0 3

2 2 0

+1 -2 +3

zombs

SEN

1.16 1.22 1.07

222 250 180

17 12 5

/ 13 8 5 /

3 0 3

+4 +4 0

75% 67% 88%

141 159 113

12% 16% 4%

0 0 0

SicK

SEN

1.12 1.21 0.98

224 237 205

15 9 6

/ 12 7 5 /

9 6 3

+3 +2 +1

85% 92% 75%

152 204 74

31% 39% 8%

3 1 2

1 1 0

+2 0 +2

ShahZaM

SEN

0.98 0.81 1.23

252 236 279

17 10 7

/ 17 11 6 /

4 2 2

0 -1 +1

95% 100% 88%

138 143 130

25% 18% 36%

6 4 2

1 1 0

+5 +3 +2

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
eeiu NRG	0.92 1.37 1.16	262 201 322	46 18 28	/ 43 19 24 /	17 4 13	+3 -1 +4	71% 67% 75%	185 146 219	29% 36% 26%	3 0 3	1 0 1	+2 0 +2
ANDROID NRG	0.79 1.12 0.96	209 186 225	37 16 21	/ 40 19 21 /	10 5 5	-3 -3 0	69% 75% 64%	138 126 148	28% 28% 28%	1 1 0	7 5 2	-6 -4 -2
daps NRG	1.19 0.61 0.88	193 241 149	34 20 14	/ 41 17 24 /	12 5 7	-7 +3 -10	60% 63% 57%	114 142 91	25% 26% 24%	3 1 2	10 2 8	-7 -1 -6
tex NRG	0.73 0.87 0.80	188 196 194	32 14 18	/ 43 20 23 /	11 6 5	-11 -6 -5	63% 67% 61%	133 134 131	25% 19% 33%	7 3 4	9 6 3	-2 -3 +1
s0m NRG	0.52 0.63 0.58	151 152 146	26 13 13	/ 42 19 23 /	9 3 6	-16 -6 -10	62% 58% 64%	94 101 88	21% 20% 21%	3 2 1	8 4 4	-5 -2 -3

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

eeiu

NRG

0.92 1.37 1.16

262 201 322

46 18 28

/ 43 19 24 /

17 4 13

+3 -1 +4

71% 67% 75%

185 146 219

29% 36% 26%

3 0 3

1 0 1

+2 0 +2

ANDROID

NRG

0.79 1.12 0.96

209 186 225

37 16 21

/ 40 19 21 /

10 5 5

-3 -3 0

69% 75% 64%

138 126 148

28% 28% 28%

1 1 0

7 5 2

-6 -4 -2

daps

NRG

1.19 0.61 0.88

193 241 149

34 20 14

/ 41 17 24 /

12 5 7

-7 +3 -10

60% 63% 57%

114 142 91

25% 26% 24%

3 1 2

10 2 8

-7 -1 -6

tex

NRG

0.73 0.87 0.80

188 196 194

32 14 18

/ 43 20 23 /

11 6 5

-11 -6 -5

63% 67% 61%

133 134 131

25% 19% 33%

7 3 4

9 6 3

-2 -3 +1

s0m

NRG

0.52 0.63 0.58

151 152 146

26 13 13

/ 42 19 23 /

9 3 6

-16 -6 -10

62% 58% 64%

94 101 88

21% 20% 21%

3 2 1

8 4 4

-5 -2 -3

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
SicK SEN	1.08 1.47 1.26	263 239 311	45 21 24	/ 36 19 17 /	24 12 12	+9 +2 +7	85% 82% 88%	183 178 188	28% 32% 23%	7 3 4	1 1 0	+6 +2 +4
ShahZaM SEN	1.14 1.29 1.21	248 244 250	43 24 19	/ 35 19 16 /	18 7 11	+8 +5 +3	88% 93% 83%	147 143 153	26% 29% 24%	7 5 2	1 1 0	+6 +4 +2
TenZ SEN	1.30 0.91 1.12	238 264 201	42 26 16	/ 35 18 17 /	14 9 5	+7 +8 -1	79% 86% 71%	147 165 126	17% 18% 15%	15 8 7	7 3 4	+8 +5 +3
dapr SEN	0.96 1.22 1.08	214 207 211	40 21 19	/ 35 20 15 /	15 10 5	+5 +1 +4	65% 64% 67%	128 128 129	22% 23% 22%	5 1 4	6 4 2	-1 -3 +2
zombs SEN	1.02 1.08 1.05	203 204 192	39 23 16	/ 34 18 16 /	13 0 13	+5 +5 0	77% 75% 79%	122 121 122	12% 12% 11%	1 1 0	2 1 1	-1 0 -1

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

SicK

SEN

1.08 1.47 1.26

263 239 311

45 21 24

/ 36 19 17 /

24 12 12

+9 +2 +7

85% 82% 88%

183 178 188

28% 32% 23%

7 3 4

1 1 0

+6 +2 +4

ShahZaM

SEN

1.14 1.29 1.21

248 244 250

43 24 19

/ 35 19 16 /

18 7 11

+8 +5 +3

88% 93% 83%

147 143 153

26% 29% 24%

7 5 2

1 1 0

+6 +4 +2

TenZ

SEN

1.30 0.91 1.12

238 264 201

42 26 16

/ 35 18 17 /

14 9 5

+7 +8 -1

79% 86% 71%

147 165 126

17% 18% 15%

15 8 7

7 3 4

+8 +5 +3

dapr

SEN

0.96 1.22 1.08

214 207 211

40 21 19

/ 35 20 15 /

15 10 5

+5 +1 +4

65% 64% 67%

128 128 129

22% 23% 22%

5 1 4

6 4 2

-1 -3 +2

zombs

SEN

1.02 1.08 1.05

203 204 192

39 23 16

/ 34 18 16 /

13 0 13

+5 +5 0

77% 75% 79%

122 121 122

12% 12% 11%

1 1 0

2 1 1

-1 0 -1

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
ANDROID NRG	1.08 1.16 0.99	197 227 169	23 13 10	/ 22 11 11 /	7 5 2	+1 +2 -1	75% 88% 63%	123 158 88	25% 28% 20%	1 1 0	3 2 1	-2 -1 -1
eeiu NRG	1.06 0.55 1.58	282 163 401	29 9 20	/ 28 14 14 /	11 2 9	+1 -5 +6	75% 69% 81%	192 118 266	35% 39% 33%	2 0 2	1 0 1	+1 0 +1
tex NRG	0.92 0.69 1.15	216 194 239	23 10 13	/ 25 13 12 /	7 3 4	-2 -3 +1	66% 63% 69%	146 127 166	23% 16% 32%	6 3 3	5 3 2	+1 0 +1
daps NRG	0.91 1.34 0.48	185 239 132	20 14 6	/ 24 10 14 /	7 2 5	-4 +4 -8	59% 63% 56%	118 149 86	22% 26% 15%	0 0 0	6 2 4	-6 -2 -4
s0m NRG	0.48 0.47 0.48	137 165 111	14 9 5	/ 26 13 13 /	8 2 6	-12 -4 -8	66% 63% 69%	91 107 75	17% 23% 10%	2 2 0	6 3 3	-4 -1 -3

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

ANDROID

NRG

1.08 1.16 0.99

197 227 169

23 13 10

/ 22 11 11 /

7 5 2

+1 +2 -1

75% 88% 63%

123 158 88

25% 28% 20%

1 1 0

3 2 1

-2 -1 -1

eeiu

NRG

1.06 0.55 1.58

282 163 401

29 9 20

/ 28 14 14 /

11 2 9

+1 -5 +6

75% 69% 81%

192 118 266

35% 39% 33%

2 0 2

1 0 1

+1 0 +1

tex

NRG

0.92 0.69 1.15

216 194 239

23 10 13

/ 25 13 12 /

7 3 4

-2 -3 +1

66% 63% 69%

146 127 166

23% 16% 32%

6 3 3

5 3 2

+1 0 +1

daps

NRG

0.91 1.34 0.48

185 239 132

20 14 6

/ 24 10 14 /

7 2 5

-4 +4 -8

59% 63% 56%

118 149 86

22% 26% 15%

0 0 0

6 2 4

-6 -2 -4

s0m

NRG

0.48 0.47 0.48

137 165 111

14 9 5

/ 26 13 13 /

8 2 6

-12 -4 -8

66% 63% 69%

91 107 75

17% 23% 10%

2 2 0

6 3 3

-4 -1 -3

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
ShahZaM SEN	1.36 1.39 1.32	243 251 236	26 14 12	/ 18 8 10 /	14 5 9	+8 +6 +2	84% 88% 81%	153 142 164	27% 38% 21%	1 1 0	0 0 0	+1 +1 0
SicK SEN	1.35 0.98 1.71	302 241 365	30 12 18	/ 24 12 12 /	15 6 9	+6 0 +6	84% 75% 94%	202 159 245	26% 27% 26%	4 2 2	0 0 0	+4 +2 +2
dapr SEN	1.03 1.08 0.97	190 233 147	23 14 9	/ 22 12 10 /	7 6 1	+1 +2 -1	59% 63% 56%	121 131 111	21% 25% 16%	2 1 1	4 2 2	-2 -1 -1
TenZ SEN	1.02 1.09 0.94	224 239 211	24 13 11	/ 24 12 12 /	9 6 3	0 +1 -1	75% 81% 69%	137 147 127	21% 20% 22%	13 6 7	5 2 3	+8 +4 +4
zombs SEN	0.98 0.87 1.09	183 169 197	22 11 11	/ 21 10 11 /	10 0 10	+1 +1 0	78% 81% 75%	110 93 127	12% 8% 16%	1 1 0	2 1 1	-1 0 -1

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

ShahZaM

SEN

1.36 1.39 1.32

243 251 236

26 14 12

/ 18 8 10 /

14 5 9

+8 +6 +2

84% 88% 81%

153 142 164

27% 38% 21%

1 1 0

0 0 0

+1 +1 0

SicK

SEN

1.35 0.98 1.71

302 241 365

30 12 18

/ 24 12 12 /

15 6 9

+6 0 +6

84% 75% 94%

202 159 245

26% 27% 26%

4 2 2

0 0 0

+4 +2 +2

dapr

SEN

1.03 1.08 0.97

190 233 147

23 14 9

/ 22 12 10 /

7 6 1

+1 +2 -1

59% 63% 56%

121 131 111

21% 25% 16%

2 1 1

4 2 2

-2 -1 -1

TenZ

SEN

1.02 1.09 0.94

224 239 211

24 13 11

/ 24 12 12 /

9 6 3

0 +1 -1

75% 81% 69%

137 147 127

21% 20% 22%

13 6 7

5 2 3

+8 +4 +4

zombs

SEN

0.98 0.87 1.09

183 169 197

22 11 11

/ 21 10 11 /

10 0 10

+1 +1 0

78% 81% 75%

110 93 127

12% 8% 16%

1 1 0

2 1 1

-1 0 -1

MontyPython75

Frags

–

TSM vs NRG

PG_newt

-2

Frags

–

ABX vs TSM
ABX 2-1

AdN-

Frags

–

MontyPython75 [#1]

TSM vs NRG

👀 TSM OMEGALUL

PG_newt

Frags

–

PG_newt [#2]

ABX vs TSM
ABX 2-1

well this didnt go well

itsmedavidjones

Frags

–

i think NRG vs SEN
but this qualifier tier 1 teams were having so many upsets so i might be wrong too

itsmedavidjones

Frags

–

it's for seeding so I think we won't see any flashy plays and strats , so predictions will be inaccurate

itsmedavidjones

Frags

–

AdN- [#3]

👀 TSM OMEGALUL

sad to see my man ROZA to go :(

Swiftmal12

Frags

–

SEN vs NRG 2-0 SEN

AdN-

Frags

–

itsmedavidjones [#7]

sad to see my man ROZA to go :(

true

#10

alexzoid

Frags

–

SEN 2-1 NRG

#11

ASD

-1

Frags

–

sentinels have been looking off and NRG been looking good so i think NRG can take it 2-1

ok nvm nrg throw

#12

alexploopy

Frags

–

Honestly, the lower bracket seems easier without 100t

#13

emo

-1

Frags

–

quick 2-0 for SEN

#14

emo

Frags

–

I rly don’t get NRG’s logic. They FINALLY QUALIFIED WITH 10000 ATTEMPTS somewhere and after this they decided to play like they don’t fucking care. This is very funny, they are unworthy

#15

PapuRockets

Frags

–

MontyPython75 [#1]

TSM vs NRG

nt bro haha

#16

MontyPython75

Frags

–

PapuRockets [#15]

nt bro haha

unlucky really

#17

Ullyr

Frags

–

yeah just feels like NRG are out of it after qualifying , it was a poor showing from them against c9 too.

#18

Kibitz

Frags

–

come on NRG atleast take map 2 so i can watch more matches today

#19

QPM

-1

Frags

–

Zombs pure throw

#20

QPM

Frags

–

Kibitz [#18]

come on NRG atleast take map 2 so i can watch more matches today

They will
zombs throwing hard lmao 🤣

#21

emo

Frags

–

Kibitz [#18]

come on NRG atleast take map 2 so i can watch more matches today

2-0 SEN

#22

QPM

Frags

–

emo [#21]

2-0 SEN

It could be 2-0, if SEN decided to win 2v1

#23

BluWasTaken

Frags

–

lmao haven't seen anyone die to the flamewall for a hot minute

#24

ShiNN

Frags

–

The worst omen I've ever seen in the competitive. No logic, and smokes aren't in time

#25

emo

Frags

–

ShiNN [#24]

The worst omen I've ever seen in the competitive. No logic, and smokes aren't in time

da som dolboeb ebaniy 0iq

#26

w1nT3r

Frags

–

ShiNN [#24]

The worst omen I've ever seen in the competitive. No logic, and smokes aren't in time

Yepp, 100% worst omen. Such a thrower definitely didn't have 6 kills less than the top player of the game. Just awful,. You sound dumb

#27

GetsystheGr8

Frags

–

S0m doesn't play omen on this map... prob just trying stuff out

#28

ShiNN

Frags

–

GetsystheGr8 [#27]

S0m doesn't play omen on this map... prob just trying stuff out

Anyway, look at zombs and other players on this role from top 4. They feel this role and know how to play. But s0m doesn't know. As far as I know he joined as dps like jett. But I see that this role isn't suitable for him

#29

greedeetv

Frags

–

ShiNN [#28]

Anyway, look at zombs and other players on this role from top 4. They feel this role and know how to play. But s0m doesn't know. As far as I know he joined as dps like jett. But I see that this role isn't suitable for him

So... what?
1) Zombs isn't top 4
2) Omen utility is the most straightforward in the game, and he doesn't even have to lurk

I could write a paragraph but don't feel like it

#30

ShiNN

Frags

–

greedeetv [#29]

So... what?
1) Zombs isn't top 4
2) Omen utility is the most straightforward in the game, and he doesn't even have to lurk

I could write a paragraph but don't feel like it

Sorry, from top 4 teams

#31

emo

Frags

–

greedeetv [#29]

So... what?
1) Zombs isn't top 4
2) Omen utility is the most straightforward in the game, and he doesn't even have to lurk

I could write a paragraph but don't feel like it

lol zombs is a tier1 player on his position. he is doing all that dirty shit that u can’t see

#ZOMBSNATION

#32

w1nT3r

Frags

–

greedeetv [#29]

So... what?
1) Zombs isn't top 4
2) Omen utility is the most straightforward in the game, and he doesn't even have to lurk

I could write a paragraph but don't feel like it

Stay mad

#33

anothervlruser

Frags

–

greedeetv [#29]

So... what?
1) Zombs isn't top 4
2) Omen utility is the most straightforward in the game, and he doesn't even have to lurk

I could write a paragraph but don't feel like it

#zombsnation

#34

FireII

Frags

–

commented on the wrong post im sorry 🥺🙏

#35

Sova_Viper_Breach_Cypher

-1

Frags

–

FireII [#34]

commented on the wrong post im sorry 🥺🙏

no one asked bro

#36

number_1_bjor_fan

Frags

–

Sova_Viper_Breach_Cypher [#35]

no one asked bro

i did :)