bbg fluke?

so is it safe to say that bbg vs sen was a fluke and sen was just playing off ?

fLuKeRz

beb0p [#2]

fLuKeRz

Maybe... we will see

So I guess it depends on your definition of a fluke. They won specifically because of anti-stratting and the format of the tournament and SEN's lack of preparation, which isn't necessarily to do with luck. But yeah, BBG isn't that good. Never were. They're better than they were before because of Poach, but... results speak for themselves.

Too early to tell we will see as the bracket progresses

OMEGALUL

If betting money on VAL matches exist, im pretty sure why some Teams lose like they haven't played Val for Months...

GetsystheGr8 [#3]

Maybe... we will see

i mean even if they beat version 1 they still lost to XSET pretty bad

greedeetv [#4]

So I guess it depends on your definition of a fluke. They won specifically because of anti-stratting and the format of the tournament and SEN's lack of preparation, which isn't necessarily to do with luck. But yeah, BBG isn't that good. Never were. They're better than they were before because of Poach, but... results speak for themselves.

Yeah but they've been saddled with old COD players for there entire start of this game. Critical put up big numbers with Mamba Mode, Will's stats and potential speak for themselves, and finally Bjor was on Immortals for a while and is a talented sentinel player. They have an actual IGL in Poach now and Rarkar was on original China Nguyen when they actually won things. This teams deserves a shot

BBG ain't bad but not the first time SEN did a "tactical" throw