ez the noah aiello
The
|
The
|
The
|
The
|
The
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
25
9
+16
|
25
9
+16
|
25
9
+16
|
25
9
+16
|
25
9
+16
|
dapr
SEN
|
31
14
+17
|
31
14
+17
|
31
14
+17
|
31
14
+17
|
31
14
+17
|
zombs
SEN
|
17
15
+2
|
17
15
+2
|
17
15
+2
|
17
15
+2
|
17
15
+2
|
TenZ
SEN
|
37
13
+24
|
37
13
+24
|
37
13
+24
|
37
13
+24
|
37
13
+24
|
SicK
SEN
|
31
9
+22
|
31
9
+22
|
31
9
+22
|
31
9
+22
|
31
9
+22
|
The
|
The
|
The
|
The
|
The
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
1
1
+0
|
1
1
+0
|
1
1
+0
|
1
1
+0
|
1
1
+0
|
dapr
SEN
|
5
0
+5
|
5
0
+5
|
5
0
+5
|
5
0
+5
|
5
0
+5
|
zombs
SEN
|
3
3
+0
|
3
3
+0
|
3
3
+0
|
3
3
+0
|
3
3
+0
|
TenZ
SEN
|
10
2
+8
|
10
2
+8
|
10
2
+8
|
10
2
+8
|
10
2
+8
|
SicK
SEN
|
4
1
+3
|
4
1
+3
|
4
1
+3
|
4
1
+3
|
4
1
+3
|
The
|
The
|
The
|
The
|
The
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
0
1
-1
|
0
1
-1
|
0
1
-1
|
0
1
-1
|
0
1
-1
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
5
0
+5
|
5
0
+5
|
5
0
+5
|
5
0
+5
|
5
0
+5
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
6
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
1
|
0
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
9
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
5
|
2
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
4
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
0
|
1
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
0
|
0
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
3
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
2
|
0
|
The
|
|
9
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
36
|
5
|
0
|
The
|
The
|
The
|
The
|
The
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
2
0
+2
|
2
0
+2
|
2
0
+2
|
2
0
+2
|
2
0
+2
|
dapr
SEN
|
4
0
+4
|
4
0
+4
|
4
0
+4
|
4
0
+4
|
4
0
+4
|
zombs
SEN
|
3
1
+2
|
3
1
+2
|
3
1
+2
|
3
1
+2
|
3
1
+2
|
TenZ
SEN
|
4
1
+3
|
4
1
+3
|
4
1
+3
|
4
1
+3
|
4
1
+3
|
SicK
SEN
|
2
1
+1
|
2
1
+1
|
2
1
+1
|
2
1
+1
|
2
1
+1
|
The
|
The
|
The
|
The
|
The
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
zombs
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
TenZ
SEN
|
2
1
+1
|
2
1
+1
|
2
1
+1
|
2
1
+1
|
2
1
+1
|
SicK
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
The
|
The
|
The
|
The
|
The
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
2
Round 2
Round 6
|
3
Round 1
Round 10
Round 15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
0
|
0
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
3
Round 10
Round 11
Round 12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
|
1
|
1
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
1
Round 8
|
1
Round 13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
0
|
0
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
2
Round 9
Round 11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
0
|
0
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
|
3
Round 4
Round 5
Round 14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
|
0
|
0
|
The
|
|
1
Round 15
SicK
zombs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
1
|
0
|
The
|
The
|
The
|
The
|
The
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
3
1
+2
|
3
1
+2
|
3
1
+2
|
3
1
+2
|
3
1
+2
|
dapr
SEN
|
1
2
-1
|
1
2
-1
|
1
2
-1
|
1
2
-1
|
1
2
-1
|
zombs
SEN
|
3
0
+3
|
3
0
+3
|
3
0
+3
|
3
0
+3
|
3
0
+3
|
TenZ
SEN
|
4
3
+1
|
4
3
+1
|
4
3
+1
|
4
3
+1
|
4
3
+1
|
SicK
SEN
|
3
1
+2
|
3
1
+2
|
3
1
+2
|
3
1
+2
|
3
1
+2
|
The
|
The
|
The
|
The
|
The
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
1
0
+1
|
SicK
SEN
|
1
1
+0
|
1
1
+0
|
1
1
+0
|
1
1
+0
|
1
1
+0
|
The
|
The
|
The
|
The
|
The
|
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
|
|
|
|
2K | 3K | 4K | 5K | 1v1 | 1v2 | 1v3 | 1v4 | 1v5 | ECON | PL | DE | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TenZ
SEN
|
|
4
Round 2
Round 5
Round 10
Round 12
|
1
Round 13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
1
|
0
|
SicK
SEN
|
|
6
Round 1
Round 6
Round 8
Round 12
Round 13
Round 15
|
1
Round 3
|
|
|
1
Round 12
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
4
|
1
|
ShahZaM
SEN
|
|
3
Round 7
Round 10
Round 15
|
2
Round 9
Round 11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
0
|
1
|
zombs
SEN
|
|
1
Round 2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
0
|
0
|
dapr
SEN
|
|
3
Round 1
Round 4
Round 7
|
1
Round 14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
2
|
0
|
The
|
|
1
Round 5
TenZ
ShahZaM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
1
|
0
|
make that ur opinion, can't understand how acend is more inconsistent than sent, can't blame them from having actual competition. EU has a lot of teams that are very good, we can't say the same for NA, that's why sent appears so dominant. This is gonna be like CS, RL or any other game, NA thinks they are the best, and then get immediately clapped.
i don't know a lot about the EU region but your point of "can't say the same for NA" kappa, NA has like 8 teams who are really close to each other in terms of competition, definitely sen were winning but you need to understand the fact that these SEN players have their coordination and team-work before valo they are a team since beta version and others came a bit later and rn all the other 7-8 teams are pretty strong
Still can't see a world where any of the other teams beats SEN. The other teams may be evenly matched but only between each other. The only team who can win against SEN is Envy, faze is good but they can't adapt to SEN's playstyle and lose pretty easily. In EU, there's at least 5 teams capable of beating Acend, and believe me, if u are looking for coordination and team plays you should watch EU. NA has the best aim, I will give you that, but EU has everything else. I feel like SEN still relies too much on solo plays.
ye why would he play with c9 when his teammates were bots....it caused him to play bad too in few matches which can lead to his career down in the drain. ofcourse hes still on the loan but wouldnt be surprised with sentinels bought him and tenz choosing to compete. better for his stream and pro career
He can't just "quit" C9, he has a contract with them for the next 3 years. And the way these contracts are written in esports, makes it so that you can't represent another organisation whilst under contract and the only way to void the contract is if someone else bought it out or C9 broke its contractual obligations(i.e. stop paying TenZ's paycheck). C9 could keep TenZ on the bench for the next 3 years if they wanted to, whilst he of course would still be collecting the paycheck for doing nothing, but that also would prevent him from "quitting" C9 as you imply.