Will the loser of senvs 100t face the winner of xset vs geng ?
Added Astra
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
243 194 | 13 3 10 | / 17 5 12 / | 5 2 3 | -4 -2 -2 | 166 125 | 21% 30% 19% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 | |||
|
189 153 | 9 2 7 | / 14 5 9 / | 8 1 7 | -5 -3 -2 | 133 111 | 22% 13% 24% | 1 0 1 | 0 0 0 | +1 0 +1 | |||
|
185 95 | 12 7 5 | / 16 5 11 / | 2 2 0 | -4 +2 -6 | 115 51 | 23% 30% 15% | 2 1 1 | 5 1 4 | -3 0 -3 | |||
|
180 97 | 12 5 7 | / 14 6 8 / | 5 4 1 | -2 -1 -1 | 130 66 | 11% 11% 11% | 2 1 1 | 1 0 1 | +1 +1 0 | |||
|
107 76 | 6 2 4 | / 15 5 10 / | 6 0 6 | -9 -3 -6 | 65 47 | 13% 0% 19% | 1 1 0 | 4 2 2 | -3 -1 -2 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
323 146 | 24 14 10 | / 7 5 2 / | 6 4 2 | +17 +9 +8 | 228 67 | 36% 36% 36% | 3 1 2 | 0 0 0 | +3 +1 +2 | |||
|
238 88 | 16 10 6 | / 11 6 5 / | 3 1 2 | +5 +4 +1 | 137 46 | 18% 23% 10% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 | |||
|
224 57 | 14 11 3 | / 10 7 3 / | 6 3 3 | +4 +4 0 | 161 37 | 20% 21% 19% | 4 4 0 | 0 0 0 | +4 +4 0 | |||
|
193 60 | 14 10 4 | / 14 9 5 / | 4 2 2 | 0 +1 -1 | 94 19 | 13% 19% 0% | 1 0 1 | 5 1 4 | -4 -1 -3 | |||
|
116 33 | 8 6 2 | / 10 6 4 / | 4 2 2 | -2 0 -2 | 80 20 | 21% 20% 22% | 2 2 0 | 2 1 1 | 0 +1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
291 176 | 39 16 23 | / 37 16 21 / | 12 6 6 | +2 0 +2 | 186 102 | 18% 20% 17% | 5 2 3 | 5 2 3 | 0 0 0 | |||
|
194 110 | 28 14 14 | / 35 13 22 / | 10 7 3 | -7 +1 -8 | 138 61 | 14% 14% 14% | 3 1 2 | 10 2 8 | -7 -1 -6 | |||
|
171 90 | 26 15 11 | / 33 13 20 / | 18 3 15 | -7 +2 -9 | 111 58 | 18% 18% 19% | 2 2 0 | 7 2 5 | -5 0 -5 | |||
|
162 71 | 23 13 10 | / 37 18 19 / | 9 5 4 | -14 -5 -9 | 112 49 | 12% 13% 10% | 4 3 1 | 4 1 3 | 0 +2 -2 | |||
|
162 100 | 19 8 11 | / 29 13 16 / | 20 9 11 | -10 -5 -5 | 132 94 | 24% 21% 26% | 1 0 1 | 2 1 1 | -1 -1 0 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
254 122 | 40 22 18 | / 24 12 12 / | 9 5 4 | +16 +10 +6 | 164 57 | 34% 38% 30% | 4 1 3 | 4 2 2 | 0 -1 +1 | |||
|
245 112 | 37 22 15 | / 25 14 11 / | 11 3 8 | +12 +8 +4 | 167 71 | 19% 19% 20% | 6 5 1 | 2 2 0 | +4 +3 +1 | |||
|
212 101 | 33 21 12 | / 25 13 12 / | 7 4 3 | +8 +8 0 | 126 51 | 22% 20% 24% | 12 8 4 | 4 1 3 | +8 +7 +1 | |||
|
203 96 | 29 15 14 | / 29 13 16 / | 14 7 7 | 0 +2 -2 | 115 50 | 13% 16% 10% | 4 2 2 | 0 0 0 | +4 +2 +2 | |||
|
192 73 | 32 20 12 | / 32 18 14 / | 11 7 4 | 0 +2 -2 | 112 42 | 25% 26% 24% | 2 1 1 | 5 1 4 | -3 0 -3 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
338 162 | 26 13 13 | / 20 11 9 / | 7 4 3 | +6 +2 +4 | 202 84 | 17% 18% 14% | 4 2 2 | 3 1 2 | +1 +1 0 | |||
|
235 101 | 20 13 7 | / 18 8 10 / | 12 3 9 | +2 +5 -3 | 147 67 | 21% 22% 19% | 1 1 0 | 3 0 3 | -2 +1 -3 | |||
|
202 123 | 16 7 9 | / 19 8 11 / | 8 5 3 | -3 -1 -2 | 157 68 | 9% 3% 13% | 1 0 1 | 5 1 4 | -4 -1 -3 | |||
|
143 50 | 11 8 3 | / 23 12 11 / | 4 1 3 | -12 -4 -8 | 98 35 | 13% 15% 9% | 2 2 0 | 3 1 2 | -1 +1 -2 | |||
|
135 59 | 10 6 4 | / 15 8 7 / | 12 8 4 | -5 -2 -3 | 130 80 | 26% 24% 30% | 0 0 0 | 2 1 1 | -2 -1 -1 |
R2.0 | ACS | K | D | A | +/– | KAST | ADR | HS% | FK | FD | +/– | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
308 156 | 25 15 10 | / 15 7 8 / | 3 2 1 | +10 +8 +2 | 162 75 | 22% 20% 24% | 10 6 4 | 2 0 2 | +8 +6 +2 | |||
|
266 156 | 23 11 12 | / 15 7 8 / | 5 0 5 | +8 +4 +4 | 173 98 | 19% 16% 20% | 2 1 1 | 2 2 0 | 0 -1 +1 | |||
|
191 83 | 18 10 8 | / 18 9 9 / | 7 5 2 | 0 +1 -1 | 127 60 | 38% 35% 41% | 1 1 0 | 0 0 0 | +1 +1 0 | |||
|
184 103 | 16 8 8 | / 17 7 10 / | 3 1 2 | -1 +1 -2 | 113 49 | 31% 39% 25% | 1 0 1 | 4 2 2 | -3 -2 -1 | |||
|
167 103 | 13 5 8 | / 18 7 11 / | 11 6 5 | -5 -2 -3 | 97 52 | 9% 8% 10% | 2 1 1 | 0 0 0 | +2 +1 +1 |
GenG has shown to be good with preparation, even grabbing a game off of Envy. 100T have been looking a bit winded lately, sure they beat Immortals but it was less than convincing. However, they're going to get a lot more practice with Ethan. I'm not sure that's going to matter because Ethan is already showing why he was a good pickup and the rest of the team needs to step up in accordance. I think this is a really close match, but GenG 2-1.
4Head my name is hiko 4Head i'm a baiter 4Head ill meet you on site 4Head a lil bit later 4Head
In all reality 100T just look way too predictable. They run the same play default and teams counter it and they just keep doing it expecting something different. And if Asuna dies early, the round is a gg. 100T gotta hit the lab hard or else this won't be the first time they don't do much.
gg geng but it looks like 100t are finding who is their operator in the mid tourney, if there is any 1 mistake in the entire tourney made by 100t it is considering 1 duelist comp. They are falling short on making that agression. Now dont come at hiko, the entire 100t strategy is based on info collection by hiko, kills or not he is essential. The only way he could be replaced is if 100t finds a good sova player or make someone else sova and he retires. But dont target him or steel.(or any player on any team who came this far)
Players will always be targeted if people see them as underperforming its the way esports is and it will always be that way. If you've got an underdog who's gone above expectation then I doubt they'll be gunned for, but if you've got a big team like 100t with alot of pressure and expectation.....expect it if they lose 2-0 and take it on the chin pal...
yes i get the fact that the change should be necessary and agree that a team like 100t shouldnt have performed this bad. The main problem is the strats they are running is the main issue. If we compare the performance on icebox and ascent we can see clearly, the strats and agent compositions are not letting players draw their best. The previous iteration of 100t has a good balance of agressiveness and defence. But this roster is pure defencive in most cases. That is hugely affecting the performances.
The fact that they didnot rectify their mistake on ascent from the game with sentinels only tells, that the analysis part from the 100t is very bad. Their preperation is very bad. Sometimes it feels they dont have pride of being the champions of first strike while attacking. They are too careful at checking that they allow enough time to rotate.
This said Hiko is kind of too passive these days. I hope they cut him off respectably if they consider it.Or he should stream less and give himself enough time to catch up with all the trends and have enough rest.They have nitro who is already pugging with sova sometimes. They can make him play sova and try and get another duelist player. Or kick both steel and hiko(possibly not considering their contribution to the team) and let nitr0 igl. Better they soon hope ethan tries out duelists.
That said I completely agree with your point. I also see valorant slowly trending to more agressive style, which some teams like 100t take a lot of time to adapt, especially since they were trying to completely go the opposite direction. Still 5 to 6 position is not bad, but it is far from their standards.
100 thieves try to implement eu meta into their games and fail miserably, then everyone calls single duelists bad. The whole point of eu meta is being unpredictable and always getting trades. 100t are way too predictable and they just don't get trades. Another thing is that if you're gonna pick sage you need that player to frag, or else no ultimate, therefore no impact.