This team went from placing 5th in champs
To getting grouped with 0 wins
What happened🤔
0
Xerxia
posted in
Valorant Discussion
Comments:
Threaded
Linear
Elcatsu [#3]just like gambit, acend, sentinels
Nah bro gambit and acend don't dominate their region like Xerxia does
sushiboys who supposed to be our 2nd star player played bad in this stage, and we got an unlucky group in reykjavik i think
Nollihd [#5]Nah bro gambit and acend don't dominate their region like Xerxia does
xerxia... dont... dominate.... ?
their playstyle are great dont get me wrong, but their agent comps are so outdated like surf, i remember last stage dude playin jett all the time while there's other duelist that could fit well into certain maps such as split, fracture, bind, etc like raze and neon.
dongrumble [#8]xerxia... dont... dominate.... ?
Check round differential in thailand
Nollihd [#5]Nah bro gambit and acend don't dominate their region like Xerxia does
yeah because gambit and acend fell off real hard
Nollihd [#10]Check round differential in thailand
thailand is a subregion.
almost every other team qualified to apac playoffs is dominant in their (sub)region other than ph and/or indo
They were very close matches tbh, they just saving start for another top 8 champs run dw.
Elcatsu [#11]yeah because gambit and acend fell off real hard
But Gambit got the 2nd place on the Champions no one reached the final after their wins. Optic were close, but its not #2
jwise [#7]sushiboys who supposed to be our 2nd star player played bad in this stage, and we got an unlucky group in reykjavik i think
Maybe because he isnt comfortable with raze?compare to his kj or cypher
Miting [#16]But Gambit got the 2nd place on the Champions no one reached the final after their wins. Optic were close, but its not #2
They second in berlin
shahzam2004 [#19]They second in berlin
"no one reached the final after their wins"
Chikuwa [#18]Maybe because he isnt comfortable with raze?compare to his kj or cypher
could be but tbh he wasn't that good with sentinels either, idk might be just a bad tournament for him since he did fine in reykjavik
definitioNvlrt [#20]surf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pati
agreed, people kinda overrating pati a bit too much
Carthage_Er_Pola [#12]downvoted for speaking faxx
u doesn't know anything so stfu
Miting [#16]But Gambit got the 2nd place on the Champions no one reached the final after their wins. Optic were close, but its not #2
yes but optic were top 3 after they won? lol and gambit only appeared twice in international event, optic had 4. and 3 out of these 4 they were always in the top 3. berlin 2nd, reykjavik 1st, copenhagen 3rd.
definitioNvlrt [#20]surf >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pati
fax...surf is just a better team player than pati
sashimi boy didn't perform well and he's also their star player. could've EASILY 2-0 fpx w/ sub but threw map 1
Elcatsu [#26]yes but optic were top 3 after they won? lol and gambit only appeared twice in international event, optic had 4. and 3 out of these 4 they were always in the top 3. berlin 2nd, reykjavik 1st, copenhagen 3rd.
I think there are no questions about inside competition of two regions (NA and EMEA) and where is harder to qualify. Yes, Optic is one of the best teams in Valorant short history, but I still value Champions is higher than Masters. IMHO
Discord