Jesus you’re an actual keyboard warrior and cant a joke, but ok. I didnt say analogies rely on semantics, I said that semantics arent the purpose of analogies and arent what people should be looking at when seeing one, and should instead focus on if the analogy makes sense from a conceptual pov. If, as suggested, you change my analogy to “the fact that mussolini was right happened because of the fact that mussolini said sentinels is washed”. That includes a cause and effect scenario, because it implies that if mussolini hadnt said that sentinels is washed then he wouldnt be right. Happy now?