OpTic Gaming vs. Guild Esports | Valorant Champions Tour Stage 2: Masters Copenhagen | Group Stage | Valorant match

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Marved OPTC	1.33 1.72 0.93	288 362 215	22 14 8	/ 19 8 11 /	8 5 3	+3 +6 -3	71% 83% 58%	211 266 157	33% 37% 28%	1 0 1	3 2 1	-2 -2 0
crashies OPTC	1.04 0.81 1.28	167 104 230	15 5 10	/ 18 7 11 /	12 5 7	-3 -2 -1	79% 83% 75%	103 57 150	31% 21% 38%	1 0 1	1 1 0	0 -1 +1
Victor OPTC	0.78 0.74 0.82	171 186 156	13 7 6	/ 21 10 11 /	14 7 7	-8 -3 -5	71% 75% 67%	133 128 139	16% 17% 16%	0 0 0	4 2 2	-4 -2 -2
FiNESSE OPTC	0.74 0.92 0.57	201 201 203	14 9 5	/ 20 8 12 /	6 3 3	-6 +1 -7	71% 83% 58%	158 166 151	19% 23% 16%	2 1 1	3 1 2	-1 0 -1
yay OPTC	0.62 0.63 0.61	171 199 144	12 8 4	/ 21 10 11 /	5 0 5	-9 -2 -7	58% 58% 58%	115 113 117	16% 15% 16%	4 2 2	5 3 2	-1 -1 0

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

Marved

OPTC

1.33 1.72 0.93

288 362 215

22 14 8

/ 19 8 11 /

8 5 3

+3 +6 -3

71% 83% 58%

211 266 157

33% 37% 28%

1 0 1

3 2 1

-2 -2 0

crashies

OPTC

1.04 0.81 1.28

167 104 230

15 5 10

/ 18 7 11 /

12 5 7

-3 -2 -1

79% 83% 75%

103 57 150

31% 21% 38%

1 0 1

1 1 0

0 -1 +1

Victor

OPTC

0.78 0.74 0.82

171 186 156

13 7 6

/ 21 10 11 /

14 7 7

-8 -3 -5

71% 75% 67%

133 128 139

16% 17% 16%

0 0 0

4 2 2

-4 -2 -2

FiNESSE

OPTC

0.74 0.92 0.57

201 201 203

14 9 5

/ 20 8 12 /

6 3 3

-6 +1 -7

71% 83% 58%

158 166 151

19% 23% 16%

2 1 1

3 1 2

-1 0 -1

yay

OPTC

0.62 0.63 0.61

171 199 144

12 8 4

/ 21 10 11 /

5 0 5

-9 -2 -7

58% 58% 58%

115 113 117

16% 15% 16%

4 2 2

5 3 2

-1 -1 0

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Sayf GLD	1.48 1.76 1.19	284 313 255	24 14 10	/ 15 6 9 /	6 3 3	+9 +8 +1	88% 83% 92%	180 212 148	38% 40% 35%	6 2 4	2 1 1	+4 +1 +3
Leo GLD	1.42 1.28 1.57	243 207 280	23 11 12	/ 13 6 7 /	8 3 5	+10 +5 +5	88% 92% 83%	138 127 148	23% 25% 21%	3 1 2	2 1 1	+1 0 +1
koldamenta GLD	1.30 1.52 1.09	277 337 217	24 15 9	/ 16 7 9 /	7 5 2	+8 +8 0	79% 75% 83%	173 199 146	22% 29% 16%	4 3 1	3 3 0	+1 0 +1
trexx GLD	1.21 1.24 1.18	249 285 213	20 11 9	/ 16 8 8 /	19 10 9	+4 +3 +1	92% 100% 83%	164 202 125	19% 20% 17%	2 0 2	0 0 0	+2 0 +2
Russ GLD	0.60 0.77 0.43	101 115 89	8 5 3	/ 16 7 9 /	13 5 8	-8 -2 -6	79% 92% 67%	70 79 61	29% 36% 24%	1 1 0	1 0 1	0 +1 -1

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

Sayf

GLD

1.48 1.76 1.19

284 313 255

24 14 10

/ 15 6 9 /

6 3 3

+9 +8 +1

88% 83% 92%

180 212 148

38% 40% 35%

6 2 4

2 1 1

+4 +1 +3

Leo

GLD

1.42 1.28 1.57

243 207 280

23 11 12

/ 13 6 7 /

8 3 5

+10 +5 +5

88% 92% 83%

138 127 148

23% 25% 21%

3 1 2

2 1 1

+1 0 +1

koldamenta

GLD

1.30 1.52 1.09

277 337 217

24 15 9

/ 16 7 9 /

7 5 2

+8 +8 0

79% 75% 83%

173 199 146

22% 29% 16%

4 3 1

3 3 0

+1 0 +1

trexx

GLD

1.21 1.24 1.18

249 285 213

20 11 9

/ 16 8 8 /

19 10 9

+4 +3 +1

92% 100% 83%

164 202 125

19% 20% 17%

2 0 2

0 0 0

+2 0 +2

Russ

GLD

0.60 0.77 0.43

101 115 89

8 5 3

/ 16 7 9 /

13 5 8

-8 -2 -6

79% 92% 67%

70 79 61

29% 36% 24%

1 1 0

1 0 1

0 +1 -1

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Marved OPTC	1.44 1.16 1.30	271 293 245	49 26 23	/ 40 20 20 /	15 8 7	+9 +6 +3	78% 78% 78%	185 215 154	31% 34% 28%	5 1 4	5 4 1	0 -3 +3
crashies OPTC	0.81 1.21 1.01	175 137 216	34 13 21	/ 38 18 20 /	18 8 10	-4 -5 +1	72% 74% 70%	112 85 139	23% 17% 28%	2 1 1	3 2 1	-1 -1 0
FiNESSE OPTC	0.87 0.94 0.91	212 190 236	36 18 18	/ 43 21 22 /	14 6 8	-7 -3 -4	70% 74% 67%	147 134 160	18% 16% 19%	4 2 2	4 1 3	0 +1 -1
Victor OPTC	0.71 0.79 0.75	196 196 203	32 16 16	/ 48 24 24 /	24 11 13	-16 -8 -8	69% 70% 67%	139 121 157	18% 18% 18%	5 1 4	12 7 5	-7 -6 -1
yay OPTC	0.62 0.74 0.68	149 173 121	25 15 10	/ 41 22 19 /	7 1 6	-16 -7 -9	57% 52% 63%	98 104 91	14% 11% 16%	7 4 3	7 4 3	0 0 0

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

Marved

OPTC

1.44 1.16 1.30

271 293 245

49 26 23

/ 40 20 20 /

15 8 7

+9 +6 +3

78% 78% 78%

185 215 154

31% 34% 28%

5 1 4

5 4 1

0 -3 +3

crashies

OPTC

0.81 1.21 1.01

175 137 216

34 13 21

/ 38 18 20 /

18 8 10

-4 -5 +1

72% 74% 70%

112 85 139

23% 17% 28%

2 1 1

3 2 1

-1 -1 0

FiNESSE

OPTC

0.87 0.94 0.91

212 190 236

36 18 18

/ 43 21 22 /

14 6 8

-7 -3 -4

70% 74% 67%

147 134 160

18% 16% 19%

4 2 2

4 1 3

0 +1 -1

Victor

OPTC

0.71 0.79 0.75

196 196 203

32 16 16

/ 48 24 24 /

24 11 13

-16 -8 -8

69% 70% 67%

139 121 157

18% 18% 18%

5 1 4

12 7 5

-7 -6 -1

yay

OPTC

0.62 0.74 0.68

149 173 121

25 15 10

/ 41 22 19 /

7 1 6

-16 -7 -9

57% 52% 63%

98 104 91

14% 11% 16%

7 4 3

0 0 0

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Leo GLD	1.29 1.54 1.42	245 230 260	52 24 28	/ 30 16 14 /	14 8 6	+22 +8 +14	83% 85% 81%	144 140 149	27% 27% 27%	6 2 4	2 1 1	+4 +1 +3
trexx GLD	1.26 1.10 1.18	259 297 224	45 26 19	/ 39 20 19 /	27 13 14	+6 +6 0	83% 81% 85%	170 199 141	17% 21% 13%	9 4 5	5 4 1	+4 0 +4
Sayf GLD	1.29 0.99 1.14	220 237 189	41 23 18	/ 33 16 17 /	8 5 3	+8 +7 +1	72% 70% 74%	143 167 119	32% 32% 32%	7 2 5	6 3 3	+1 -1 +2
koldamenta GLD	1.01 1.05 1.03	228 195 251	43 19 24	/ 37 17 20 /	18 11 7	+6 +2 +4	74% 67% 81%	139 121 157	23% 23% 23%	6 3 3	5 3 2	+1 0 +1
Russ GLD	0.71 0.90 0.81	153 139 178	29 13 16	/ 37 20 17 /	23 11 12	-8 -7 -1	78% 81% 74%	109 96 123	34% 38% 31%	3 2 1	5 3 2	-2 -1 -1

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

Leo

GLD

1.29 1.54 1.42

245 230 260

52 24 28

/ 30 16 14 /

14 8 6

+22 +8 +14

83% 85% 81%

144 140 149

27% 27% 27%

6 2 4

2 1 1

+4 +1 +3

trexx

GLD

1.26 1.10 1.18

259 297 224

45 26 19

/ 39 20 19 /

27 13 14

+6 +6 0

83% 81% 85%

170 199 141

17% 21% 13%

9 4 5

5 4 1

+4 0 +4

Sayf

GLD

1.29 0.99 1.14

220 237 189

41 23 18

/ 33 16 17 /

8 5 3

+8 +7 +1

72% 70% 74%

143 167 119

32% 32% 32%

7 2 5

6 3 3

+1 -1 +2

koldamenta

GLD

1.01 1.05 1.03

228 195 251

43 19 24

/ 37 17 20 /

18 11 7

+6 +2 +4

74% 67% 81%

139 121 157

23% 23% 23%

6 3 3

5 3 2

+1 0 +1

Russ

GLD

0.71 0.90 0.81

153 139 178

29 13 16

/ 37 20 17 /

23 11 12

-8 -7 -1

78% 81% 74%

109 96 123

34% 38% 31%

3 2 1

5 3 2

-2 -1 -1

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Marved OPTC	1.28 1.22 1.34	253 238 269	27 12 15	/ 21 12 9 /	7 3 4	+6 0 +6	83% 73% 93%	163 175 151	29% 31% 28%	4 1 3	2 2 0	+2 -1 +3
FiNESSE OPTC	1.04 0.83 1.25	222 182 263	22 9 13	/ 23 13 10 /	8 3 5	-1 -4 +3	70% 67% 73%	138 109 167	17% 11% 22%	2 1 1	1 0 1	+1 +1 0
crashies OPTC	0.99 0.82 1.15	183 163 205	19 8 11	/ 20 11 9 /	6 3 3	-1 -3 +2	67% 67% 67%	119 109 129	19% 15% 22%	1 1 0	2 1 1	-1 0 -1
Victor OPTC	0.73 0.69 0.76	221 203 241	19 9 10	/ 27 14 13 /	10 4 6	-8 -5 -3	67% 67% 67%	144 116 172	19% 18% 20%	5 1 4	8 5 3	-3 -4 +1
yay OPTC	0.73 0.61 0.84	127 153 103	13 7 6	/ 20 12 8 /	2 1 1	-7 -5 -2	57% 47% 67%	84 97 71	13% 7% 17%	3 2 1	2 1 1	+1 +1 0

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

Marved

OPTC

1.28 1.22 1.34

253 238 269

27 12 15

/ 21 12 9 /

7 3 4

+6 0 +6

83% 73% 93%

163 175 151

29% 31% 28%

4 1 3

2 2 0

+2 -1 +3

FiNESSE

OPTC

1.04 0.83 1.25

222 182 263

22 9 13

/ 23 13 10 /

8 3 5

-1 -4 +3

70% 67% 73%

138 109 167

17% 11% 22%

2 1 1

1 0 1

+1 +1 0

crashies

OPTC

0.99 0.82 1.15

183 163 205

19 8 11

/ 20 11 9 /

6 3 3

-1 -3 +2

67% 67% 67%

119 109 129

19% 15% 22%

1 1 0

2 1 1

-1 0 -1

Victor

OPTC

0.73 0.69 0.76

221 203 241

19 9 10

/ 27 14 13 /

10 4 6

-8 -5 -3

67% 67% 67%

144 116 172

19% 18% 20%

5 1 4

8 5 3

-3 -4 +1

yay

OPTC

0.73 0.61 0.84

127 153 103

13 7 6

/ 20 12 8 /

2 1 1

-7 -5 -2

57% 47% 67%

84 97 71

13% 7% 17%

3 2 1

2 1 1

+1 +1 0

	R^2.0	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	KAST	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Leo GLD	1.41 1.31 1.51	246 249 244	29 13 16	/ 17 10 7 /	6 5 1	+12 +3 +9	80% 80% 80%	150 150 150	30% 29% 31%	3 1 2	0 0 0	+3 +1 +2
trexx GLD	1.15 1.27 1.03	269 307 232	25 15 10	/ 23 12 11 /	8 3 5	+2 +3 -1	77% 67% 87%	175 196 154	16% 22% 10%	7 4 3	5 4 1	+2 0 +2
Russ GLD	0.97 0.67 1.27	204 158 250	21 8 13	/ 21 13 8 /	10 6 4	0 -5 +5	77% 73% 80%	141 109 172	36% 39% 34%	2 1 1	4 3 1	-2 -2 0
Sayf GLD	0.87 0.91 0.84	156 177 136	17 9 8	/ 18 10 8 /	2 2 0	-1 -1 0	60% 60% 60%	113 131 95	27% 26% 29%	1 0 1	4 2 2	-3 -2 -1
koldamenta GLD	0.82 0.61 1.03	179 81 278	19 4 15	/ 21 10 11 /	11 6 5	-2 -6 +4	70% 60% 80%	112 59 165	24% 11% 30%	2 0 2	2 0 2	0 0 0

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

Leo

GLD

1.41 1.31 1.51

246 249 244

29 13 16

/ 17 10 7 /

6 5 1

+12 +3 +9

80% 80% 80%

150 150 150

30% 29% 31%

3 1 2

0 0 0

+3 +1 +2

trexx

GLD

1.15 1.27 1.03

269 307 232

25 15 10

/ 23 12 11 /

8 3 5

+2 +3 -1

77% 67% 87%

175 196 154

16% 22% 10%

7 4 3

5 4 1

+2 0 +2

Russ

GLD

0.97 0.67 1.27

204 158 250

21 8 13

/ 21 13 8 /

10 6 4

0 -5 +5

77% 73% 80%

141 109 172

36% 39% 34%

2 1 1

4 3 1

-2 -2 0

Sayf

GLD

0.87 0.91 0.84

156 177 136

17 9 8

/ 18 10 8 /

2 2 0

-1 -1 0

60% 60% 60%

113 131 95

27% 26% 29%

1 0 1

4 2 2

-3 -2 -1

koldamenta

GLD

0.82 0.61 1.03

179 81 278

19 4 15

/ 21 10 11 /

11 6 5

-2 -6 +4

70% 60% 80%

112 59 165

24% 11% 30%

2 0 2

0 0 0

#285

moatz

-6

Frags

–

"there is a reason why EU is the best FPS region" 🤓
Keep coping shitmea fan

#286

deXterS

Frags

–

Nothing to cope about that's the reality and result is in front of you. And I dont know if anyone would even argue against that. I get it, it would be hard for you to accept but I can only wish you a good luck. cheers!

#287

moatz

-4

Frags

–

"That's the reality" is the most delusional thing I've heard today but good luck to you too.

#288

deXterS

Frags

–

Not accepting a reality is the most delusional thing but good luck proving NA is better in FPS than EU , lol

#289

moatz

-4

Frags

–

Just because you believe in it doesn't make it a reality but anyways gl in ur future endeavors.
Imma stop replying now bc I believe that you are already too deep into your delusion.

#291

dackring

Frags

–

stay mad ez 2:0 get ready to go back airport after loud game

#297

moatz

-2

Frags

–

dont worry. even if that happens, na still has xset and the best initiator itw, bcj.

#298

deXterS

Frags

–

Im really curios like how would you even prove that NA is better than EU in FPS?? I mean in CSGO NA is total trash and out of almost all tournament in qualifiers really bad, in valorant only time they managed to win was when EU teams had a subs. Before that tourny there were 3 out of 4 were EU in semifinal of champions. I am not sure what im missing here probably your shoe size IQ but yeah good luck again.

#299

moatz

-2

Frags

–

"Only time they managed to win was when EU teams had subs"
That literally only happened for one tourney prior to this bc of the russia thing.
Also it's not like na teams nvr have subs.

#300

deXterS

Frags

–

Ammm , What are you a bot?? "That literally only happened for one tourney prior to this bc of the russia thing." yeah and that was the time NA managed to win lol, do you know how many EU teams were in semifinal champions?? and no NA didnt had sub neither in masters 3 or champions , you dont know what you are talking about

#301

moatz

-2

Frags

–

Tell me you don't watch val without telling me you don't watch val

Remember SEN's run last yr?

SEN is a team from NA believe it or not

#302

deXterS

Frags

–

yeah that lil tourney with 12 teams and valorant just started count it, and still after that both the masters and champions won by EU team, right now EU has 1 champions 1 masters , and NA has 2 masters , just yesterday EU's 3rd seed beat the NA's best team lul.,, In CSGO NA is basically the free kills for EU .anything else you got there???

continue thread →