Immortals vs. Gen.G | Champions Tour North America Stage 1: Challengers 2 | Main Event | Valorant match

	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Genghsta IMT	283 82	21 16 5	/ 10 7 3 /	10 5 5	+11 +9 +2	179 58	30% 30% 31%	0 0 0	1 1 0	-1 -1 0
Kehmicals IMT	269 121	18 10 8	/ 13 9 4 /	5 2 3	+5 +1 +4	159 69	19% 14% 26%	5 2 3	3 1 2	+2 +1 +1
ShoT_UP IMT	243 120	14 6 8	/ 19 12 7 /	10 8 2	-5 -6 +1	124 49	19% 19% 18%	5 2 3	2 1 1	+3 +1 +2
jcStani IMT	207 87	15 8 7	/ 14 11 3 /	8 7 1	+1 -3 +4	116 44	20% 19% 21%	2 1 1	0 0 0	+2 +1 +1
NaturE IMT	163 71	12 5 7	/ 11 10 1 /	7 6 1	+1 -5 +6	107 41	20% 14% 29%	0 0 0	1 1 0	-1 -1 0

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

Genghsta

IMT

283 82

21 16 5

/ 10 7 3 /

10 5 5

+11 +9 +2

179 58

30% 30% 31%

0 0 0

1 1 0

-1 -1 0

Kehmicals

IMT

269 121

18 10 8

/ 13 9 4 /

5 2 3

+5 +1 +4

159 69

19% 14% 26%

5 2 3

3 1 2

+2 +1 +1

ShoT_UP

IMT

243 120

14 6 8

/ 19 12 7 /

10 8 2

-5 -6 +1

124 49

19% 19% 18%

5 2 3

2 1 1

+3 +1 +2

jcStani

IMT

207 87

15 8 7

/ 14 11 3 /

8 7 1

+1 -3 +4

116 44

20% 19% 21%

2 1 1

0 0 0

+2 +1 +1

NaturE

IMT

163 71

12 5 7

/ 11 10 1 /

7 6 1

+1 -5 +6

107 41

20% 14% 29%

0 0 0

1 1 0

-1 -1 0

	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Shawn12590 GEN	314 224	22 7 15	/ 17 7 10 /	6 2 4	+5 0 +5	181 133	20% 32% 16%	1 0 1	2 2 0	-1 -2 +1
MkaeL GEN	248 207	15 4 11	/ 16 7 9 /	7 1 6	-1 -3 +2	139 109	13% 8% 15%	0 0 0	2 2 0	-2 -2 0
gMd GEN	213 151	13 5 8	/ 16 7 9 /	5 1 4	-3 -2 -1	124 86	24% 29% 23%	3 0 3	3 0 3	0 0 0
koosta GEN	150 125	9 1 8	/ 15 7 8 /	8 1 7	-6 -6 0	105 86	16% 0% 21%	1 0 1	1 2 -1	0 -2 +2
HUYNH GEN	133 108	8 1 7	/ 16 7 9 /	5 1 4	-8 -6 -2	92 74	35% 22% 40%	2 0 2	4 2 2	-2 -2 0

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

Shawn12590

GEN

314 224

22 7 15

/ 17 7 10 /

6 2 4

+5 0 +5

181 133

20% 32% 16%

1 0 1

2 2 0

-1 -2 +1

MkaeL

GEN

248 207

15 4 11

/ 16 7 9 /

7 1 6

-1 -3 +2

139 109

13% 8% 15%

0 0 0

2 2 0

-2 -2 0

gMd

GEN

213 151

13 5 8

/ 16 7 9 /

5 1 4

-3 -2 -1

124 86

24% 29% 23%

3 0 3

0 0 0

koosta

GEN

150 125

9 1 8

/ 15 7 8 /

8 1 7

-6 -6 0

105 86

16% 0% 21%

1 0 1

1 2 -1

0 -2 +2

HUYNH

GEN

133 108

8 1 7

/ 16 7 9 /

5 1 4

-8 -6 -2

92 74

35% 22% 40%

2 0 2

4 2 2

-2 -2 0

	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Genghsta IMT	273 115	41 26 15	/ 25 15 10 /	18 10 8	+16 +11 +5	199 94	28% 32% 24%	0 0 0	1 1 0	-1 -1 0
ShoT_UP IMT	255 142	34 17 17	/ 35 18 17 /	15 10 5	-1 -1 0	136 71	22% 24% 20%	8 4 4	3 3 0	+5 +1 +4
Kehmicals IMT	228 121	32 15 17	/ 30 18 12 /	9 4 5	+2 -3 +5	139 74	15% 15% 16%	11 3 8	10 3 7	+1 0 +1
NaturE IMT	192 98	28 13 15	/ 26 17 9 /	13 9 4	+2 -4 +6	125 61	24% 21% 27%	2 1 1	2 1 1	0 0 0
jcStani IMT	163 73	23 12 11	/ 31 18 13 /	13 11 2	-8 -6 -2	99 43	21% 21% 21%	4 2 2	0 0 0	+4 +2 +2

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

Genghsta

IMT

273 115

41 26 15

/ 25 15 10 /

18 10 8

+16 +11 +5

199 94

28% 32% 24%

0 0 0

1 1 0

-1 -1 0

ShoT_UP

IMT

255 142

34 17 17

/ 35 18 17 /

15 10 5

-1 -1 0

136 71

22% 24% 20%

8 4 4

3 3 0

+5 +1 +4

Kehmicals

IMT

228 121

32 15 17

/ 30 18 12 /

9 4 5

+2 -3 +5

139 74

15% 15% 16%

11 3 8

10 3 7

+1 0 +1

NaturE

IMT

192 98

28 13 15

/ 26 17 9 /

13 9 4

+2 -4 +6

125 61

24% 21% 27%

2 1 1

0 0 0

jcStani

IMT

163 73

23 12 11

/ 31 18 13 /

13 11 2

-8 -6 -2

99 43

21% 21% 21%

4 2 2

0 0 0

+4 +2 +2

	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
Shawn12590 GEN	275 142	41 21 20	/ 33 15 18 /	15 5 10	+8 +6 +2	156 84	24% 26% 23%	3 1 2	4 3 1	-1 -2 +1
MkaeL GEN	269 171	34 14 20	/ 31 16 15 /	18 7 11	+3 -2 +5	154 88	11% 8% 15%	3 0 3	5 3 2	-2 -3 +1
HUYNH GEN	182 121	27 10 17	/ 33 16 17 /	7 1 6	-6 -6 0	117 79	30% 22% 35%	5 3 2	9 3 6	-4 0 -4
gMd GEN	178 106	24 11 13	/ 31 14 17 /	12 3 9	-7 -3 -4	105 62	22% 25% 21%	3 0 3	5 0 5	-2 0 -2
koosta GEN	159 111	21 6 15	/ 30 15 15 /	13 6 7	-9 -9 0	96 62	14% 11% 16%	2 0 2	2 3 -1	0 -3 +3

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

Shawn12590

GEN

275 142

41 21 20

/ 33 15 18 /

15 5 10

+8 +6 +2

156 84

24% 26% 23%

3 1 2

4 3 1

-1 -2 +1

MkaeL

GEN

269 171

34 14 20

/ 31 16 15 /

18 7 11

+3 -2 +5

154 88

11% 8% 15%

3 0 3

5 3 2

-2 -3 +1

HUYNH

GEN

182 121

27 10 17

/ 33 16 17 /

7 1 6

-6 -6 0

117 79

30% 22% 35%

5 3 2

9 3 6

-4 0 -4

gMd

GEN

178 106

24 11 13

/ 31 14 17 /

12 3 9

-7 -3 -4

105 62

22% 25% 21%

3 0 3

5 0 5

-2 0 -2

koosta

GEN

159 111

21 6 15

/ 30 15 15 /

13 6 7

-9 -9 0

96 62

14% 11% 16%

2 0 2

2 3 -1

0 -3 +3

	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
ShoT_UP IMT	267 161	20 11 9	/ 16 6 10 /	5 2 3	+4 +5 -1	145 89	26% 33% 22%	3 2 1	1 2 -1	+2 0 +2
Genghsta IMT	263 144	20 10 10	/ 15 8 7 /	8 5 3	+5 +2 +3	215 126	27% 35% 20%	0 0 0	0 0 0	0 0 0
NaturE IMT	220 122	16 8 8	/ 15 7 8 /	6 3 3	+1 +1 0	140 78	26% 26% 26%	2 1 1	1 0 1	+1 +1 0
Kehmicals IMT	186 120	14 5 9	/ 17 9 8 /	4 2 2	-3 -4 +1	122 79	10% 16% 5%	6 1 5	7 2 5	-1 -1 0
jcStani IMT	119 60	8 4 4	/ 17 7 10 /	5 4 1	-9 -3 -6	85 42	23% 24% 21%	2 1 1	0 0 0	+2 +1 +1

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

ShoT_UP

IMT

267 161

20 11 9

/ 16 6 10 /

5 2 3

+4 +5 -1

145 89

26% 33% 22%

3 2 1

1 2 -1

+2 0 +2

Genghsta

IMT

263 144

20 10 10

/ 15 8 7 /

8 5 3

+5 +2 +3

215 126

27% 35% 20%

0 0 0

NaturE

IMT

220 122

16 8 8

/ 15 7 8 /

6 3 3

+1 +1 0

140 78

26% 26% 26%

2 1 1

1 0 1

+1 +1 0

Kehmicals

IMT

186 120

14 5 9

/ 17 9 8 /

4 2 2

-3 -4 +1

122 79

10% 16% 5%

6 1 5

7 2 5

-1 -1 0

jcStani

IMT

119 60

8 4 4

/ 17 7 10 /

5 4 1

-9 -3 -6

85 42

23% 24% 21%

2 1 1

0 0 0

+2 +1 +1

	ACS	K	D	A	+/–	ADR	HS%	FK	FD	+/–
MkaeL GEN	290 139	19 10 9	/ 15 9 6 /	11 6 5	+4 +1 +3	166 70	10% 8% 14%	3 0 3	3 1 2	0 -1 +1
Shawn12590 GEN	236 71	19 14 5	/ 16 8 8 /	9 3 6	+3 +6 -3	134 43	30% 24% 50%	2 1 1	2 1 1	0 0 0
HUYNH GEN	230 133	19 9 10	/ 17 9 8 /	2 0 2	+2 0 +2	139 82	28% 22% 31%	3 3 0	5 1 4	-2 +2 -4
koosta GEN	168 99	12 5 7	/ 15 8 7 /	5 5 0	-3 -3 0	89 42	13% 17% 10%	1 0 1	1 1 0	0 -1 +1
gMd GEN	142 68	11 6 5	/ 15 7 8 /	7 2 5	-4 -1 -3	88 40	20% 23% 17%	0 0 0	2 0 2	-2 0 -2

R^2.0

ACS

+/–

KAST

ADR

HS%

+/–

MkaeL

GEN

290 139

19 10 9

/ 15 9 6 /

11 6 5

+4 +1 +3

166 70

10% 8% 14%

3 0 3

3 1 2

0 -1 +1

Shawn12590

GEN

236 71

19 14 5

/ 16 8 8 /

9 3 6

+3 +6 -3

134 43

30% 24% 50%

2 1 1

0 0 0

HUYNH

GEN

230 133

19 9 10

/ 17 9 8 /

2 0 2

+2 0 +2

139 82

28% 22% 31%

3 3 0

5 1 4

-2 +2 -4

koosta

GEN

168 99

12 5 7

/ 15 8 7 /

5 5 0

-3 -3 0

89 42

13% 17% 10%

1 0 1

1 1 0

0 -1 +1

gMd

GEN

142 68

11 6 5

/ 15 7 8 /

7 2 5

-4 -1 -3

88 40

20% 23% 17%

0 0 0

2 0 2

-2 0 -2

Heavon

Frags

–

I can't see how Gen G can win this.

SharubuNguvu

Frags

–

jcStani internet going out might be a possible reason

valplayer1

Frags

–

IMT 2-0, GenG's sloppy win over TSM doesn't convince me that they can beat IMT, it'll be an interesting match to watch though..

jayy

Frags

–

2-1 imt

PoPanda

Frags

–

I genuinely don't know what to think about this series. Before GenG's victory over TSM, I would've explected Immortals to dominate. But now, I'm not too sure.

GenG are so much better with a bit of pace to their strats. They have the mechanical skill to make stunning agressive plays. But, then again, they're up against Immortals, who are one of the smartest, assertive teams in NA.

Their last match-up was interesting, GenG made a good showing on Ascent. Bind was a slaughter fest.

But, with TSM and Cloud9 under their belts. GenG might have the momentum needed to take the victory.

I dunno

taxxje

Frags

–

ShoT_UP tactical nuke incoming

greedeetv

Frags

–

I think part of the reason Immortals is so successful is their aggressiveness, unpredictability, and set-up for fraggers. Shot up is one of the better aimers in NA with very aggressive habits to boot. A team with enough preparation can quench Immortals, which might be their downfall in this tournament. On the other side, GenG is definitely the underdog in this series, coming off of an intense victory over TSM. They're a much slower-paced team than immortals. This match will come down to who will control the pace of the game and cool-headedness from GenG. It's not going to be a close series either way imo. 2-0 IMT

greedeetv

Frags

–

Another note, it seems in their previous encounters, GenG has struggled on the defense side of the maps, even on (slightly) CT sided maps like Bind or Ascent. They did a decent job against TSM, but TSM is nowhere near as explosive as Immortals. We'll see if they can adapt.

Fat_Lard

Frags

–

IMT 2-0 but the maps should be pretty close