7

''9-15''

Comments:
Threaded Linear
← View full thread
#31
Cheddar
0
Frags
+

so if s1mple dont win shit with Navi this year is he also not a "winner"??? your logic is so dumb

#33
jawn
-1
Frags
+

CS is a game that literally never changes, so s1mple winning a major will still hold credibility, Valorant changes metas and teams emerge and fall off in a span of months, past success means nothing. Since sen last won 2 maps and 3 agents have released

#37
Cheddar
0
Frags
+

"past success means nothing" so how does Yay success hold any weight then when the meta has already changed since masters?

#38
jawn
0
Frags
+

because he is the winner of the most recent valorant major, after the next masters a new top player will emerge

#40
Cheddar
0
Frags
+

ok, now i get where u are coming from. I guess you can view the game that way, but its quite a narrow view. But i can get it.

#34
YouDii
1
Frags
+

Dont compare s1mple to tenz, s1mple has played at the very top level for 9 years putting astounding numbers and always placing high at tournaments, they are not at the same level whatsoever.

#36
Cheddar
-1
Frags
+

why tf would i compare players in completely different games? the fact u thought i was doing that shows your IQ is very low.

#39
YouDii
1
Frags
+

You used s1mple as a comparison in your argument, why would you bring up s1mple not winning anything this year if you're not comparing them, smartest vlr lurker

#35
factsonly
0
Frags
+

no comparin goat s1mple to tenz

but u r wasting time talking to this guy

cuz he rlly hit me up with ''they didn't qualify bruh'

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
Sign up or log in to post a comment