0

Optic is embarrassing

Comments:
Threaded Linear
#1
vnet

Wasn't able to watch yesterdays match, but its frankly sad. Constantly falling short every tourney, got lucky earlier this year and didn't face any really good teams(only good team they faced was LOUD, and they were still new). M2 they got smoked by double duelist PRX, absolutely outmatched and then in the lowers finally got a map off an EU team. Champs they faced the same teams they've faced before except BOOM, and still dropped a map to them. These guys constantly get 2nd-3rd place and its embarrassing that a team with so much talent falls short , they're like TSM in 2014-2015(Astralis). They need therapists or psychologists or something, these guys have such a mental block in their heads that they just cannot win unless they get an easy way(M1)

#2
charizard_123
70
Frags
+

If optic is embarrassing then what is sentinels

#22
h9zard
18
Frags
+

always catching strays đŸ˜Ș

#31
vnet
-7
Frags
+

A team of washed up CS rejects. Tenz can't adapt, Shazam sucked at CSGO and sucks at Valorant even when they were winning, any team that picks shazam is an idiot, they had a fluke run and won the first tournament when no one knew how to play.

#48
SAMPV6
5
Frags
+

bruh we didn't even say anything 😭

#3
Mjtchell
49
Frags
+

Instead of discrediting Optic maybe give credit to LOUD

#8
vnet
-14
Frags
+

Loud is a good team , thats for sure. But for a team thats being crowned "best team of valorant" they've won once, and they frankly got lucky the entire way(optic). LOUD is a fantastic team, best in the world . Not trying to discredit loud but trying to discredit optic, Yay is good and even then this dude is just consistent, he's no s1mple/zywoo where they can just win games for them. Hes a Paul George player, meanwhile loud is full of 5 Michael Jordans

#13
aylez
8
Frags
+

you aren’t discrediting them but you say LOUD got lucky? you, my friend, need to take a peek at LOUD’s games because there was little luck that played into them winning.

#17
vnet
-1
Frags
+

I said "But for a team thats being crowned "best team of valorant" they've won once, and they frankly got lucky the entire way(optic)." I was talking about Optic being lucky they got into the finals, not LOUD. LOUD is the best team in the world, not optic who are consistently runner ups except one fluke run. I'm saying that optic might be "accomplished" , but are not the best. No one remembers the runners up in superbowls, NBA finals, World series, World cup ETC. They remember the winners.

#21
aylez
0
Frags
+

they arent the best, they are top 2. the numbers show that.

#49
poopboyofficial
1
Frags
+

they dropped 1 map in playoffs and are currently the BEST in the world, while optic is still best all time

#55
vnet
0
Frags
+

LOUD best in the world and best RN. I'm an optic fan and I realized the copium wasn't good, theres no excuses anymore. Why am I gonna break my back to cheer for losers. Hope they show me different next year, but doubt it. 2022 and forward is going to be the LOUD era.

#11
aylez
1
Frags
+

agree with Mjtchell.

#4
geometrix
29
Frags
+

We won a tournament. We consistently place 2nd to 3rd this year. It’s more than we could ask for honestly.

We are good, so good that regions spend shitloads of time antistratting us, putting lots of hours in to get their well-deserved (albeit disappointing to us) win.

This delusional shitter thinks that isn’t enough? ROFL

#15
vnet
-6
Frags
+

won once on a fluke. Except loud who did they play that was good? DRX was still shit back then, perennial 5-6th. No one cares about 2nd and 3rd place, LOUD is the team to beat and Optic frankly is just a overrated team. How did they get to finals? They played TL who have no IGL, XSET who they faced a million times, lost to LOUD(best team in the world) , DRX who got a lucky run to 3rd instead of 5-6th and then in the championship they lose again to loud, 3-1 which is embarrassing. for being the "most accomplished" team in valorant history, they seem to fall short every time it matters except the fluke of M1. M3 vs gambit they lost 3-0, m1 they got lucky, m2 they lost 2-1 to PRX, 3-1 to FPX, and now once again lost 3-1 to LOUD, and look at the scores of each of those games, against PRX they lost 13-3 won 13-9 lost 13-5, against FPX lost 13-6 lost 13-8 won 13-6 and lost 13-7, they got lucky that they played FPX on their best map otherwise it would've been a clean 3-0. These guys just give up on the last map and just get stomped on, doesn't matter if scores are close, a sweep or gentlemans sweep is still a sweep. No one remembers 2nd place.

#16
geometrix
7
Frags
+

Oh my god the delusion is rooted in your soul

#23
aylez
2
Frags
+

bro im sorry but if you keep discrediting optic, then i dont know what to say. you people hate on OPTC and when they win, its a fluke, win they lose, its embarrassing. what do you want from them? even if they won this champs, you would have said “fluke.” theres no argument here, you are simply discrediting the team and guess what? at the end of the day it doesnt matter bc they are winning, even if it may not be first.

#26
vnet
-3
Frags
+

Had they won this tournament, it would not have been a fluke, as in this hypothetical they've proven that they can be constant winners. 2nd/3rd place is not winning, the definition of winning according to Merriam Webster is:

Definition of winning (Entry 1 of 2)
1: the act of one that wins : VICTORY

The definition of victory
1: the overcoming of an enemy or antagonist
2: achievement of mastery or success in a struggle or endeavor against odds or difficulties

They did not overcome the enemy, sure they won some matches but if a team goes to the NBA finals and loses you won't call them winners. Look at 2016 golden state warriors, best record of all time going 73-9, were up 3-1 in the finals and ended up losing to the Cavaliers. Who is the winner, the warriors or the cavs? Same concept here, Optic are not winners.

#45
ciphetti
0
Frags
+

2: achievement of mastery or success in a struggle or endeavor against odds or difficulties

Honestly Optic succeeded this year even if they didn't necessarily win Champs.

#56
vnet
0
Frags
+

Succeeded on being runner-ups, I agree.

#60
ciphetti
0
Frags
+

Succeeded on being the most consistent? Succeeded in winning an international tournament? Succeeded on being #1 NA this year?

#50
poopboyofficial
0
Frags
+

Fluked their way to 4 top 3 finishes thats some fluke

#51
aylez
0
Frags
+

OPTC WON M2. BUT YOU SAY ITS A FLUKE. THEY ARE WINNERS THOUGHT ACCORDING TO YOUR DICTIONARY NO? NOW WHAT? bros contradicting themself every two seconds.

#54
vnet
-1
Frags
+

They won M1 dingus. They had a lucky run, the only good team they faced was LOUD, who just had an off-day. Thats been the script for this whole year, They've had it easy until they play actual good teams, like M1 Loud which they got lucky and won, M2 they got ripped by PRX, then ripped by FPX. M3 they got ripped by LOUD twice, hell they dropped a map against BOOM lmao.

#58
sealnova
0
Frags
+

Winning more than once is not a fluke when there have only been 6 global tournaments in valorant ever. They are the most consistent team in the world placing 2,3,1 this year an average placement of 2nd. Loud won champions, got 2nd to optic in another, and got eliminated first again because of optic. They are undisputedly the most consistent team in the world right now. Don't get me wrong LOUD played way better than them in the grand finals and LOUD is a fantastic team and deserves the win, although over the year optic is the best team. You are delusional, everything you are saying is opinion based and has no facts backing it. You are just an NA hater and have way too much free time to type stuff on the internet.

#59
vnet
0
Frags
+

They havent won more than once, they've won exactly one tournament which is Masters 1. The only serious competition they faced was LOUD in M1, and OpTic luckily won. They are consistent, consistent runner-ups. And no need for the insults, I guarantee you'd have a different attitude if we were in person.

#61
GoddamnSucker
0
Frags
+

Do you not know what preparations are OPTIC just tried their best in the tourney and were the most prepared one, you crazy if you think it’s luck, if you got a problem talk to riot if the Masters 1 was scripted or fluked. Delusional Fan who doesn’t touch grass and is probability depressed.

#62
Tuzlee
0
Frags
+

bro just shut ur pc

#63
Subreezy
0
Frags
+

https://www.vlr.gg/142569/optic-best-team-ever
BRO SWITCHED UP ON HIS TEAM SO FAST LMAOOO

#20
gabeconte
0
Frags
+

you on the team????

#5
Marshal_D_Teach
9
Frags
+

You must be a troll

1st, 3rd and 2nd is bad to you?

#19
vnet
-4
Frags
+

Yes, failing to win is bad. No one will remember OPTIC for 2022, LOUD will be the team of 2022. I have nothing but respect for LOUD, they are the best team in valorant. They came in 2022 with no exceptions and exceeded them, compared to Optic who have all the expectations with none of the results except one lucky tourney.

#25
aylez
1
Frags
+

oh man if failing to win is bad that must mean every team in the world is bad except LOUD right? since if OPTC wins its a fluke so surely thats your logic correct? bro is missing a part of the brain or smth.

#29
vnet
-1
Frags
+

Yes, LOUD is the best team and no other team compares, as Champs proved. I expect LOUD to keep up form in 2022 aswell, seeing as they're the only team who overcame all to win.

#38
shockyyyy
1
Frags
+

What are you smoking

#6
chesimac
0
Frags
+

Trolling for sure no? Braindead if not, give cred to loud.

#7
zyzyck
0
Frags
+

nah man give them some credit. you can support and congratulate other teams without bringing optic down, sure there might have been unfortunate circumstances earlier this year that could've given optic a slightly easier win but they still won it and continue to prove they are in contention for best in the world. they have the most consistent results of any team in valorant, most teams aren't even constantly in the running for winning events but optics been in 3 grand finals. maybe take into consideration that since valorant is a changing meta that allows other teams to rise to the top (exactly why we have 6 different major winners) yet optic can still float above. if they stick as a 5 they'll win something else

#9
aylez
1
Frags
+

im sorry what? how is pushing LOUD to OT in two of LOUD’s picks and dominating in bind falling short? you cant win every game you play. LOUD had the momentum going, didnt drop any maps the entire tournament, only against OpTic previously. LOUD had a HUGE advantage, 2 bans banning OpTic’s greatest maps and first pick. they have had the most consistent AND successful year. M1 was not a fluke, especially when you win lowers and grands 3-0. there is always improvement to be made but calling a roster who placed top 3 in every single international this year is phenomenal, something no other roster has done yet. consistency is key, they just need to push a tiny bit more for first. bro called OpTic (average 2nd place at internationals this year) embarrassing
. what does that mean for all the other teams then?? they garbage? most definitely not.

#32
Tyzehhxo
0
Frags
+

Nah coz wasn’t there something like LOUD had only lost 1 defence round on Ascent throughout champs and OPTIC had them on the ropes?

#10
h9zard
0
Frags
+

what is wrong with this guy

#12
shockyyyy
0
Frags
+

Are you seriously complaining about consistently getting top 3 every tourney

#14
Barss
0
Frags
+

Yeah bro 1st place 3rd place 2nd place is embarrassing

#18
espeon
0
Frags
+

ya man, being a consistent top 3 team every tournament in this year is "embarassing" like jesus what else could you people want, the same team winning every lan? a bit boring no?

#24
vnet
-1
Frags
+

Whats boring about wanting the team you root for to win? Its the same in real sports, why would I waste time cheering for my team to lose. As a fan you want to see your team win, and I don't believe in participation trophies for teams who fail to win.

#40
espeon
0
Frags
+

you are definitely not real lmfao, considering that optic is literally a top 2 team IN THE WORLD, there are teams who will prepare more for them because they are the best of the best. there will always be strats and meta changes that will affect teams, do you think fpx was going to be the best team of all time for long? delusional delusional delusional

#27
firo
0
Frags
+

with meta constantly changing, changing strats everytime since other teams would have figured you out, yet still placing within top 3 in all internatl lans this year is embarrassing nowadays lol

#33
vnet
0
Frags
+

Sorry for wanting the team I cheer for to win and not constantly fall short.

#28
Overlord110611
0
Frags
+

biggest bait ever or you are just not the smartest of the bunch. Top 3 every tournament with one win in a scene where no one else has been able to achieve the same results.

#30
vnet
-1
Frags
+

Not a bait, and this is VLR, the average IQ here is lower than HLTV so I don't expect most people to understand why being 2nd/3rd place is not good, no one cares about bronze medal, only gold. No one else has been able to achieve the same results because everyone else rose like a meteor and crashed, Optic has found a way to consistently fall short each time, so I guess I should give props to them for being perennial runner ups?

#34
Tyzehhxo
0
Frags
+

Nah dude you are clearly trolling with this right? There is no way you are sitting there ACTUALLY thinking this? OPTIC is the most consistent roster we have seen so far in Valorant. Top 3 in every tournament and a win? Name a team who’s done it? Credit LOUD too, OPTIC pushed hard but LOUD was the better team, doesn’t make OPTIC shit, just means LOUD was better, simple as that.

#35
vnet
0
Frags
+

Yes LOUD is better, 100% they deserved the win. Consistent doesnt mean good, Sentinels has been Consistently shit since winning. Why should I congratulate Optic for being Consistent runner ups? I should want the team I cheer for to win everything, am I wrong for that? I'm not gonna sit here and be happy that OpTic keeps falling short on all but one tournament run.

#41
shockyyyy
1
Frags
+

If you always think second place is not enough, then
A. You will always be disappointed
B. You are ungrateful as fuck, other teams would kill to be consistent 2nd/3rd
C. You clearly don’t appreciate your team enough and are not a true fan.

There is a line between wanting your team to win and putting unrealistic expectations on a team. Optic is a damn good team but on that day Loud played better. Your argument for “just want my team to win” is just stupid. Normal sports team don’t even win championships consistently. And in this game, there are so many factors contributing to a team winning. Some controllable and some uncontrollable so its really hard for a team to win back to back to back championship.

#42
vnet
0
Frags
+

You think the Optic players are satisfied being second place? I'm just holding them to the same expectations I'd hold myself accountable to, anything but winning is an L

#44
shockyyyy
0
Frags
+

So if you got consistent 2nd place, your ego would be destroyed, you would become super depressed, and you wouldnt be happy on your performance. Even Optic players were happy with their result. Yeah they wanted to win but things cant go your way all the time.

#47
Tyzehhxo
0
Frags
+

Bro the fucking team is placing as high as they are whilst being in a super competitive scene domestically and then internationally. Constantly keeping up with meta, Constantly bringing in new team comps, New strats, keeping a fresh and level head, Ofcourse they’re sad as fuck about losing but they’re probably also looking back on the year they had as the team they are and are like “damn, we really are one of the best teams” Dude, the fact that you are so braindead to not realise that OPTIC basically hasn’t had a single fucking break all year and did not burn out, cooked up new shit too, man you are literally the most brainless VLR user I’ve come across.

#57
vnet
0
Frags
+

Yea one of the best teams doesn't equal to the best. All of their goals should be to be the best, which they failed at twice. They just don't got that dog in them, and its obvious with how hard they throw most games.s

#64
Tyzehhxo
0
Frags
+

Yeah I’ve read enough, enjoy your night dude.

#36
bckainight
0
Frags
+

low quality bait

#37
vnet
0
Frags
+

Low quality Brazilian user, you don't cheer for LOUD?

#52
bckainight
0
Frags
+

lmao, do you actually listen to dua lipa?

#53
vnet
0
Frags
+

Dua Lipa is my cousin, so yes I do.

#39
jkjkjk
0
Frags
+

Most consistent team during 2022, both regionally and internationally, when looking at the results of all tournaments objectively.. is considered an embarrassment...

Hmm... ok sure, keep telling yourself that

#43
yaiima0
0
Frags
+

Literally the most consistent team in valorant history so far, idk what ur talking about

#46
karmha
0
Frags
+

this guy rlly said "didnt face any really good teams"

they lost to fpx u wouldnt consider them a good team?

also dont say "lucky the first time" bc that wouldn't explain how they got lucky being in the champs grand finals in the first place

#65
OPTIC_YAY_NO1_FAN
0
Frags
+

This has to be the worst take ever lmao , my man is sitting in the basement acting like a Great analyst or anything , i swear some of these guys are trolls on this forum

#66
OPTIC_YAY_NO1_FAN
0
Frags
+

I mean what's funny to me is that guys like him try to sound real logical and shit but irl I'm sure he would be a real nerd who really needs to go outside and have some friends no?

#67
deathlyclaws
0
Frags
+

Discrediting the most consistent team itw is not good

  • Preview
  • Edit
› check that that your post follows the forum rules and guidelines or get formatting help
This thread has been locked.